MH-139 Defensive Weapon System
Air Force and Space Force · FA8692 HELICOPTER PGM AFLCMC WIH
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation MH139-CR08 in this department, oldest first.
- Jul 10, 2026 · this noticeSources Sought
- Aug 10, 2026Sources SoughtOpen
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
This Request for Information (RFI) is issued for informational and market research purposes only in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 10. It does not constitute a solicitation, a Request for Proposal (RFP), or a promise to issue an RFP in the future. The Government will not reimburse any company or individual for expenses associated with preparing or submitting information in response to this RFI. The information provided may be used by the U.S. Air Force in developing its acquisition strategy, Statement of Work (SOW), and performance specifications. Interested parties … (show all)
are responsible for adequately marking proprietary or competition-sensitive information. BACKGROUND AND SCOPE The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC), MH-139A Program Office (AFLCMC/WIH), is conducting market research to identify sources capable of designing, integrating, and testing a modernized Defensive Weapon System (DWS) for the MH-139A aircraft. The objective of this effort is to upgrade the current M-240D DWS to better meet operational requirements. Proposed solutions must be rapidly acquirable, using components that are commercially available or within military supply wherever possible. The primary objective is to acquire a DWS that meets or exceeds operational requirements defined below. In order to meet requirements, the solution may modify or replace components, including but not limited to, the existing weapon, mounts, weapon cradle, and ammunition handling systems. Another significant objective is to acquire a weapon-agnostic mounting capability�comparable to the military-fielded Dillon Aero Huey Mount (UHMNT) to allow the interchangeable use of multiple standard DoD weapon systems; however, the Government will also consider integrated, weapon-specific mounting solutions if the proposed weapon system provides a significant tactical advantage in lethality and capacity. This effort is targeted strictly as a post-production field retrofit of the fleet of MH-139A helicopters. Technical support is expected during the initial implementation and testing of the new configuration, followed by subject matter expert support for a to-be-defined post-integration period. (For current configuration, see attachment �Figure 1: Current Configuration.�) Key requirements for the modified system include: System & Mounting Configuration System Quantity: Two (2) weapon systems per aircraft (one per side). Weapon-Agnostic Mounting: The system must feature a universal pintle mounting solution capable of supporting standard DoD crew-served weapons (e.g., comparable to the military-fielded Dillon Aero Huey Mount (UHMNT)). Structural Integration: The objective is to leverage the aircraft's existing external weapon mounting points in Figure 1 attachment. Ammunition & Logistics Ammunition Capacity: The system must support a continuous firing rate of at least 650 rounds per minute for at least one minute with a 30 second or less reload time. Servicing & Reload: The crew must be able to safely clear weapon malfunctions and perform full ammunition reloads both in-flight and on the ground without the use of specialized tools. Casing & Link Ejection: The system must safely expel spent casings and links overboard without causing damage to the aircraft and without the use of a collection device. Performance & Operation Field of Fire: Provide a maximum field of fire in all directions without damage to the aircraft (minimum of 85 degrees forward, -85 degrees aft, 4 degrees elevation, and -65 degrees depression from the �zero� position). The zero position is defined as the gun pointing straight out perpendicular to the side of the aircraft. Armed Configuration: The weapon must be capable of being in a fully armed (loaded and cocked) configuration with cabin windows and doors closed. Note: the weapon does not need to be fired with windows and doors closed. Power: If required, the system must be capable of using existing aircraft power and/or a separate battery power source to allow full operation both in-flight and on the ground with or without rotors turning. Lethality: Provide performance data demonstrating the hit percentage / ability to immobilize personnel and light vehicles at a minimum distance of 800 meters. Crew Interface & Airworthiness Crew Interface: Provide a solution for the weapon operators to maintain 2-way communication over the existing MH-139A Intercommunication System (ICS) while using the weapon. A Push-to-Talk (PTT) capability from the weapon�s handgrip is preferred, but will consider other solutions. Civil Airworthiness (Mounting & Aero): The vendor must deliver the engineering data package necessary to obtain an FAA-approved Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) for the structural mounting hardware and any aerodynamic changes to the Outer Mold Line (OML). Military Airworthiness (Weapon & Crashworthiness): The system must meet all applicable military crashworthiness and structural standards (e.g., MIL-STD-810, MIL-HDBK-516C). The vendor must provide the stress, fatigue, and firing loads analysis to support a military Engineering Change Proposal (ECP). Certification Experience: Describe your company's process and prior experience in developing engineering packages to support both FAA STCs and military ECPs for weapon system integrations on vertical lift aircraft. Support Support & Fit-Testing: Provide technical support during initial installation and testing. The Government will provide scheduled access at a Government-designated facility for fit-checks. The contractor must provide all hardware required for fit-checks; no Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) will be provided. INSTRUCTION TO POTENTIAL RESPONDENTS Respondents are encouraged to provide comprehensive responses that demonstrate existing technology, qualifications, and experience. Please structure your response to address the following sections: A. Company Information: Company Name, Address, CAGE Code, and Website URL. Point of Contact (Name, Title, Phone, Email). Business Size Status under NAICS Code 336413 (Aircraft Manufacturing), with a size standard of 1,500 employees. Please self-certify for all applicable categories: Small Business (Yes/No) Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) (Yes/No) HUBZone Certified (Yes/No) Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) (Yes/No) Company Ownership (Domestic or Foreign-owned). Interest as Prime Contractor or Subcontractor. B. Technical Capability: Provide a detailed description of your proposed solution(s). Include concept diagrams, system architecture, and preliminary specifications. Describe the process for retrofitting the solution and estimate the time required. Include estimated lifecycle maintenance actions (repair intervals, consumables, life expectancy). State whether your company possesses the necessary technical data and for the MH-139A (based on the Leonardo AW139 platform) to perform this modification. Detail your company's experience with integrating crew-served weapon systems on vertical lift aircraft. Outline your approach to system integration. Explicitly detail how your solution manages the ammunition capacity, firing rate, and reload times inside the cabin without impeding crew movement or emergency egress, and how the system integrates with existing internal cabin Ballistic Protection Systems (BPS). Describe the electrical integration required to route the handgrip Push-to-Talk (PTT) switch (or other proposed solution) into the aircraft's Intercom System (ICS) and avionics. Identify any Peculiar Support Equipment (PSE) required to load, maintain, or boresight the weapon system. Detail the initial spares provisioning strategy. Additionally, identify any components with strict shelf-life limitations or specialized storage/packaging requirements. Acknowledge your ability to provide the necessary engineering artifacts (e.g., engineering drawings, structural/load analyses, etc.) required to support a Government Configuration Control
Who won similar work
1918 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Air Force and Space Force), any industry: a loose match.
Loose match: same agency, any industry. Read the titles before treating these as competitors.
Single-winner award sizes (1890): middle half $81K to $1.9M, median $328K; range $566 to $20.7B.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION · $NOC | 17 | $2.5B | Oct 6, 2026 |
| WAREHOUSE ONE, INC | 11 | $9.0M | Sep 23, 2026 |
| RAYTHEON COMPANY · $RTX | 9 | $22.7B | Sep 29, 2026 |
| THE BOEING COMPANY · $BA | 9 | $3.5B | Oct 2, 2026 |
| LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION · $LMT | 9 | $281.4M | Aug 26, 2026 |
| ARHAB LLC | 8 | $1.0M | Aug 10, 2026 |
| HYDRAULICS INTERNATIONAL, INC. | 7 | $249.1M | Oct 19, 2026 |
| THOMAS INSTRUMENT, INCORPORATED | 7 | $57.9M | May 29, 2026 |
| L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | 7 | $22.1M | Sep 25, 2026 |
| Aantilia LLC | 7 | $3.4M | Oct 5, 2026 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.
- Oct 19, 2026ISCANI INDUSTRIES LLC$1.2MFurnish and Install Storm Shelters on Capehart Housing, Vance AFB, OKNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Oct 19, 2026HYDRAULICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.$100KF22 Hydraulic Fittings, Quick DisconnectNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Oct 19, 2026Integrity and Honor LLC$38KOverhead Door (Modified COTS)No listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Oct 19, 2026MARK C. POPE ASSOCIATES, INC.$507KRemote Control Jet Tug SystemNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Oct 19, 2026WADSWORTH BUILDERS CO INC$626KDSN/CSN Repair Bldg. 882 RoofNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Oct 19, 2026HAR-PER SALES SOLUTIONS INC$803KCummins Generators SJAFB FA480926F0080 Synopsis of AwardNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Oct 19, 2026ASIMER TECH LLC$89KPortable Light and Camera for Vance AFB, OklahomaNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Oct 19, 2026THALES USA, INC.$4.4MFMS Albania Case, Kucova Air Base NAVAIDS ProgramNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Oct 19, 2026NEW ENGLAND FIRE TECH INC$810K1798 - Hanscom AFB Fire Suppression System InspectionsNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Oct 16, 2026D AND D INDUSTRIAL SERVICES INC$199KLaundry ServicesNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
Competitive landscape
For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 3 of these past winners lobbied Air Force, Dept of since 2024 (36 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Air Force, Dept of job
- $1.5M from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 8 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 4 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 6 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.