Sources SoughtPosted Jul 10, 2026·Responses due Aug 10, 2026

MH-139 Defensive Weapon System

Air Force and Space Force · FA8692 HELICOPTER PGM AFLCMC WIH

Stage
Early notice (sources sought, presolicitation or special notice)
NAICS
Not stated
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
MH139-CR08
Set-aside
No Set aside used
PSC
1520
Place
Wright Patterson AFB, OH, USA
Contact
Chad Group (chad.group@us.af.mil)
Loading your pipeline and notes…
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation MH139-CR08 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
  • Jul 10, 2026 · this notice
    Sources Sought
  • Aug 10, 2026
    Sources Sought
    Open
Solicitation
None posted
Award
Not yet. Typical award: Sep 4, 2026 to Jan 5, 2027, middle of the range Oct 16, 2026.
Measured from 253 past early notices at Dept of the Air Force that later posted an award (middle half of cases, counted from Jul 10, 2026).

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
  • Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
  • Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.

What the notice says

This Request for Information (RFI) is issued for informational and market research purposes only in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 10. It does not constitute a solicitation, a Request for Proposal (RFP), or a promise to issue an RFP in the future. The Government will not reimburse any company or individual for expenses associated with preparing or submitting information in response to this RFI. The information provided may be used by the U.S. Air Force in developing its acquisition strategy, Statement of Work (SOW), and performance specifications. Interested parties … (show all)

are responsible for adequately marking proprietary or competition-sensitive information. BACKGROUND AND SCOPE The Air Force Life Cycle Management Center (AFLCMC), MH-139A Program Office (AFLCMC/WIH), is conducting market research to identify sources capable of designing, integrating, and testing a modernized Defensive Weapon System (DWS) for the MH-139A aircraft. The objective of this effort is to upgrade the current M-240D DWS to better meet operational requirements. Proposed solutions must be rapidly acquirable, using components that are commercially available or within military supply wherever possible. The primary objective is to acquire a DWS that meets or exceeds operational requirements defined below. In order to meet requirements, the solution may modify or replace components, including but not limited to, the existing weapon, mounts, weapon cradle, and ammunition handling systems. Another significant objective is to acquire a weapon-agnostic mounting capability�comparable to the military-fielded Dillon Aero Huey Mount (UHMNT) to allow the interchangeable use of multiple standard DoD weapon systems; however, the Government will also consider integrated, weapon-specific mounting solutions if the proposed weapon system provides a significant tactical advantage in lethality and capacity. This effort is targeted strictly as a post-production field retrofit of the fleet of MH-139A helicopters. Technical support is expected during the initial implementation and testing of the new configuration, followed by subject matter expert support for a to-be-defined post-integration period. (For current configuration, see attachment �Figure 1: Current Configuration.�) Key requirements for the modified system include: System & Mounting Configuration System Quantity: Two (2) weapon systems per aircraft (one per side). Weapon-Agnostic Mounting: The system must feature a universal pintle mounting solution capable of supporting standard DoD crew-served weapons (e.g., comparable to the military-fielded Dillon Aero Huey Mount (UHMNT)). Structural Integration: The objective is to leverage the aircraft's existing external weapon mounting points in Figure 1 attachment. Ammunition & Logistics Ammunition Capacity: The system must support a continuous firing rate of at least 650 rounds per minute for at least one minute with a 30 second or less reload time. Servicing & Reload: The crew must be able to safely clear weapon malfunctions and perform full ammunition reloads both in-flight and on the ground without the use of specialized tools. Casing & Link Ejection: The system must safely expel spent casings and links overboard without causing damage to the aircraft and without the use of a collection device. Performance & Operation Field of Fire: Provide a maximum field of fire in all directions without damage to the aircraft (minimum of 85 degrees forward, -85 degrees aft, 4 degrees elevation, and -65 degrees depression from the �zero� position). The zero position is defined as the gun pointing straight out perpendicular to the side of the aircraft. Armed Configuration: The weapon must be capable of being in a fully armed (loaded and cocked) configuration with cabin windows and doors closed. Note: the weapon does not need to be fired with windows and doors closed. Power: If required, the system must be capable of using existing aircraft power and/or a separate battery power source to allow full operation both in-flight and on the ground with or without rotors turning. Lethality: Provide performance data demonstrating the hit percentage / ability to immobilize personnel and light vehicles at a minimum distance of 800 meters. Crew Interface & Airworthiness Crew Interface: Provide a solution for the weapon operators to maintain 2-way communication over the existing MH-139A Intercommunication System (ICS) while using the weapon. A Push-to-Talk (PTT) capability from the weapon�s handgrip is preferred, but will consider other solutions. Civil Airworthiness (Mounting & Aero): The vendor must deliver the engineering data package necessary to obtain an FAA-approved Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) for the structural mounting hardware and any aerodynamic changes to the Outer Mold Line (OML). Military Airworthiness (Weapon & Crashworthiness): The system must meet all applicable military crashworthiness and structural standards (e.g., MIL-STD-810, MIL-HDBK-516C). The vendor must provide the stress, fatigue, and firing loads analysis to support a military Engineering Change Proposal (ECP). Certification Experience: Describe your company's process and prior experience in developing engineering packages to support both FAA STCs and military ECPs for weapon system integrations on vertical lift aircraft. Support Support & Fit-Testing: Provide technical support during initial installation and testing. The Government will provide scheduled access at a Government-designated facility for fit-checks. The contractor must provide all hardware required for fit-checks; no Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) will be provided. INSTRUCTION TO POTENTIAL RESPONDENTS Respondents are encouraged to provide comprehensive responses that demonstrate existing technology, qualifications, and experience. Please structure your response to address the following sections: A. Company Information: Company Name, Address, CAGE Code, and Website URL. Point of Contact (Name, Title, Phone, Email). Business Size Status under NAICS Code 336413 (Aircraft Manufacturing), with a size standard of 1,500 employees. Please self-certify for all applicable categories: Small Business (Yes/No) Woman-Owned Small Business (WOSB) (Yes/No) HUBZone Certified (Yes/No) Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) (Yes/No) Company Ownership (Domestic or Foreign-owned). Interest as Prime Contractor or Subcontractor. B. Technical Capability: Provide a detailed description of your proposed solution(s). Include concept diagrams, system architecture, and preliminary specifications. Describe the process for retrofitting the solution and estimate the time required. Include estimated lifecycle maintenance actions (repair intervals, consumables, life expectancy). State whether your company possesses the necessary technical data and for the MH-139A (based on the Leonardo AW139 platform) to perform this modification. Detail your company's experience with integrating crew-served weapon systems on vertical lift aircraft. Outline your approach to system integration. Explicitly detail how your solution manages the ammunition capacity, firing rate, and reload times inside the cabin without impeding crew movement or emergency egress, and how the system integrates with existing internal cabin Ballistic Protection Systems (BPS). Describe the electrical integration required to route the handgrip Push-to-Talk (PTT) switch (or other proposed solution) into the aircraft's Intercom System (ICS) and avionics. Identify any Peculiar Support Equipment (PSE) required to load, maintain, or boresight the weapon system. Detail the initial spares provisioning strategy. Additionally, identify any components with strict shelf-life limitations or specialized storage/packaging requirements. Acknowledge your ability to provide the necessary engineering artifacts (e.g., engineering drawings, structural/load analyses, etc.) required to support a Government Configuration Control

Who won similar work

1918 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Air Force and Space Force), any industry: a loose match.

Loose match: same agency, any industry. Read the titles before treating these as competitors.

Single-winner award sizes (1890): middle half $81K to $1.9M, median $328K; range $566 to $20.7B.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION · $NOC17$2.5BOct 6, 2026
WAREHOUSE ONE, INC11$9.0MSep 23, 2026
RAYTHEON COMPANY · $RTX9$22.7BSep 29, 2026
THE BOEING COMPANY · $BA9$3.5BOct 2, 2026
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION · $LMT9$281.4MAug 26, 2026
ARHAB LLC8$1.0MAug 10, 2026
HYDRAULICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.7$249.1MOct 19, 2026
THOMAS INSTRUMENT, INCORPORATED7$57.9MMay 29, 2026
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.7$22.1MSep 25, 2026
Aantilia LLC7$3.4MOct 5, 2026

Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 3 of these past winners lobbied Air Force, Dept of since 2024 (36 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Air Force, Dept of job
  • $1.5M from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 8 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 4 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 6 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.