Sources SoughtPosted Sep 16, 2026·Original deadline passed (Oct 6). See latest amendment for current deadline.

ARTS-V3 Third-Party Software Initiative

Air Force and Space Force · FA8210 AFLCMC WNRK HILL

Stage
Early notice (sources sought, presolicitation or special notice)
NAICS
541511
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
FA8210-26-R-9999
Set-aside
No Set aside used
PSC
Not stated
Place
USA
Contact
Kristina Lenderman (kristina.lenderman@us.af.mil)
Loading your pipeline and notes…
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation FA8210-26-R-9999 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
  • Sep 16, 2026 · this notice
    Sources Sought
Solicitation
None posted
Award
Not yet. Typical award: Nov 11, 2026 to Mar 14, 2027, middle of the range Dec 23, 2026.
Measured from 253 past early notices at Dept of the Air Force that later posted an award (middle half of cases, counted from Sep 16, 2026).

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
  • Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
  • Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.

What the notice says

1. Introduction and Purpose The United States Air Force is seeking information on industry capabilities for the Advanced Radar Threat System (ARTS) Variant 3 (V3) Variable Aperture Digital Radar (VADR) [ST1] Third-Party Software initiative. This RFI seeks input from industry to: Understand existing commercial and near-term planned capabilities relevant to the development of software for advanced threat emulation for systems like ARTS-V3. Attract both traditional and non-traditional defense contractors. Gauge industry interest in the proposed C5 structure. Refine the acquisition strategy for th… (show all)

is software approach 2. Program Background: The ARTS-V3 program develops highly channelized digital Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar systems to emulate and replicate advanced adversary threat systems. As a ruggedized, closed-loop threat emulator, ARTS-V3 functions as a representative adversary fire control or multi-functional ground-based radar. It is designed with a high degree of hardware and software flexibility, allowing it to incorporate various adversary radar models to simulate how adversaries counter and adapt to contested environments. 3. Proposed OTA Consortium Structure The Government is executing this modernization effort utilizing the Consortium for Command, Control, and Communications in Cyberspace (C5) Other Transaction Authority (OTA) agreement, pursuant to 10 U.S.C. � 4022. Managed by the Consortium Management Group (CMG), this OTA framework significantly compresses acquisition timelines compared to traditional FAR-based contracts. The ARTS-V3 program will issue Requests for White Papers (RWPs) directly to the C5 member base, leveraging an established ecosystem of technology innovators. Eligibility: Interested parties must be members of the C5 consortium to receive awards. Registration: Information on joining can be found at the CMG C5 Overview Portal https://cmgnetworks.org/become-c5-member/ 4. Key Principles for Participation Prospective partners must adhere to the following principles: System Integration: Partner with the Lead System Integrator (LSI) to manage configurations, integrate legacy baselines, test code compliance, and perform post-deployment troubleshooting. Establish formal communication channels with the LSI. MBSE Compliance: Deliver and maintain technical baselines as dynamic, digital model elements using Cameo/SysML. The Government will provide necessary Government Furnished Information (GFI). DevSecOps & Cyber: Utilize the Government's cloud-based software factory and automated CI/CD pipelines. All developments must align with Zero-Trust Architecture (ZTA) and Department of War (DoW) cybersecurity requirements. Development Isolation: Do not reuse, copy, or integrate proprietary code from adjacent vendors. Maintain strict separation between ARTS-V3 ("Red") systems and friendly ("Blue") systems; no cross-system technology reuse is permitted. Cost-Sharing: Provide a one-third (33.3%) cost-share of the total project cost if operating as a traditional DoW vendor acting as the prime performer. 5. Scope of Work, Technical Requirements, & Desired Capabilities Successful partners must demonstrate deep expertise in developing, updating, and integrating advanced threat implementations into the ARTS-V3 system using rigorous, modern software engineering practices. 5.1 Scope of Work & Required Technical Capabilities Radar Integration & DSP: Integrate existing radar or transmit-only reactive models into the ARTS-V3 system. Partner must demonstrate an understanding of radar physics, Electronic Warfare (EW) principles, and the optimization of Digital Signal Processing (DSP) algorithms. Notional Example: Development of software to emulate an emerging X-band threat for an initial capability release. Software Updates & RTOS: Update and maintain existing radar software (e.g., streamlining calibration, improving tracking algorithms, and developing multi-target kinematic tracking filters). Development requires experience with Real-Time Operating Systems (RTOS) including VxWorks, real-time Linux, modern C++ (C++14/17/20), and hardware-accelerated computing (CUDA, OpenCL). C2 User Interface & Protocols: Update the Command and Control (C2) user interface software, specifically the VADR App (VAPP), with enhanced user interfaces or expanded range capabilities. Design open, non-proprietary APIs (REST, gRPC) aligned with Lead System Integrator (LSI) Interface Control Documents (ICDs) and ensure all messaging functions remain fully compatible with existing system protocols. AESA Resource Management: Develop and implement advanced beam-scheduling and power-management algorithms optimized for Active Electronically Scanned Arrays (AESA). Zero Trust Communications: Implement micro-segmentation and secure communications, enforcing mutual TLS (mTLS 1.3) using FIPS 140-3 validated cryptographic modules to exceed baseline DoW cybersecurity mandates. Modern Programming Practices: Utilize memory-safe programming languages (e.g., Rust, Go, Python, Java) where applicable. Deep working knowledge of C++ remains necessary to successfully utilize the Government Furnished Information (GFI) Software Development Kit (SDK). AI-Assisted Development & Safety: The use of AI coding tools is permitted, provided vendors prevent CUI/DoW data exfiltration. All AI-assisted logic must be clearly identified in an automatically generated Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), undergo strict Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) review, and pass Static (SAST) and Dynamic (DAST) Application Security Testing. AI-Optimized Algorithms: Ensure the development process for advanced tactical edge algorithms aligns directly with Cognitive Electronic Warfare (CogEW) methodologies. 5.2 Desired Capabilities The Government is highly interested in partners who can deliver next-generation enhancements, specifically: Advanced Digital Twin & Closed-Loop Emulation: Novel, closed-loop threat simulations for Software-in-the-Loop (SIL) and Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) testing. AI/ML for Sensor Fusion & Cognitive EW: Embedded tactical-edge capabilities to enhance sensor fusion and threat reaction times. Predictive Maintenance: Advanced algorithms utilizing real-time system telemetry and diagnostic data to predict component failures. Development & Analysis Ecosystems: Specialized radar development environments, code-writing assistance tools, novel radar applications, and robust system analysis tools. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION (GFI) The Government will provide: Applicable threat data from intelligence community members. A Modular Threat Design and Development Template and documentation. Access to the following equipment for testing: Subscale Threat System Anechoic Chamber Cloud-based radar testing Environment Cloud-based Software code verification and Integration Environment Access to the following tools for collaboration: ARTS-V3 VADR and VAPP Software Development Kits (SDK) Containerization tools (e.g., Pod Manager, Docker, Kubernetes) Cameo Models Git repository and container registry (e.g., GitLab) 7. SECURITY Facility: Respondents should describe their classified handling and storage capabilities. An active security clearance is required to access the subscale threat system. Networks: Once under contract, personnel may need access to unclassified and classified networks up to SIPRNet (primarily for Cloud Access). Future Requirements: Respondents do not necessarily have to have a Top Secret clearances nor SAP and SCI access, but the government would like to understand each respondent�s current and future security posture up to TS/SAR and/or TS/SCI including willingness to obtain clearances and estimated timeline. 8. INDUSTRY RESPONSE AND SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS: The Air Combat Command (ACC) and other DoW organizations are supported by this project. The ARTS-V3 Program Office anticipates releasing a request for white papers through the C5 consortium as early as November 2026, with an estimated project aw

Who won similar work

31 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Air Force and Space Force), same NAICS 541511.

Single-winner award sizes (31): middle half $241K to $7.8M, median $1.3M; range $27K to $801.5M.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION · $NOC · $42.9B2$1.6BJan 16, 2025
CURTISS-WRIGHT DS, INC.2$355KApr 23, 2026
ACCENTURE FEDERAL SERVICES LLC · $ACN · $74.2B1$336.8MMar 25, 2025
DATAMINR, INC.1$317.8MAug 27, 2026
BLUE YONDER DEFENSE SOLUTIONS, LLC1$62.2MApr 24, 2026
DEFINITIVE LOGIC CORPORATION1$21.2MFeb 4, 2025
INNOVATIVE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, INC1$12.3MMay 20, 2026
ROBBINS-GIOIA, LLC1$8.8MAug 29, 2025
RAFT LLC1$6.8MOct 31, 2024
METRONOME, LLC1$6.6MNov 15, 2024

Value counts new single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling (same contract, or the same office, day and amount); that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Contract modifications are not new awards and are not added in either. Notices whose amount is a placeholder such as $999,999,999 are not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings.

Investor context
  • $NOC reported $42.9B revenue (12 months to Jun 30, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 31 past awards, $1.3M, is under 0.1% of that. SEC filing
  • $ACN reported $74.2B revenue (fiscal year ending Aug 31, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 31 past awards, $1.3M, is under 0.1% of that. SEC filing

One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 1 of these past winners lobbied Air Force, Dept of since 2024 (16 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Air Force, Dept of job
  • $448K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
  • 1 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 8 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 2 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 4 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name, including the subsidiaries a company lists in its SEC filings. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.