Sources SoughtPosted Sep 1, 2026·Original deadline passed (Aug 17). See latest amendment for current deadline.

CG-RAPTOR - COASTAL SENTINEL INDUSTRY DAY

Coast Guard · C5I DIVISION 3 PORTSMOUTH

Stage
Early notice (sources sought, presolicitation or special notice)
NAICS
928110
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
CG-Raptor_Industry_Day
Set-aside
No Set aside used
PSC
AC12
Place
San Diego, CA, USA
Contact
Ken Boyer (kenneth.s.boyer@uscg.mil)
Loading your pipeline and notes…
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation CG-Raptor_Industry_Day in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
  • Jul 30, 2026
    Sources Sought
    Open
  • Aug 12, 2026
    Sources Sought
    Open
  • Aug 14, 2026
    Sources Sought
    Open
  • Sep 1, 2026
    Sources Sought
    Open
  • Sep 1, 2026 · this notice
    Sources Sought
  • Sep 4, 2026
    Sources Sought
    Open
Solicitation
None posted
Award
Not yet. Expected award: Any day (median passed). Typical range Aug 10, 2026 to Nov 10, 2026; middle Aug 28, 2026.
Measured from 36 past early notices at Us Coast Guard that later posted an award (middle half of cases, counted from Jul 30, 2026).
Responses are due Aug 17, 2026, so an award before then is unlikely; past cases include short solicitations.

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
  • Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
  • Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.

What the notice says

NOTE: The United States Coast Guard (USCG) is conducting market research to gather industry input regarding relevant technologies that could strengthen the Coastal Sentinel capability portfolio. This RFI does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP), Invitation for Bid (IFB), or Request for Quotation (RFQ), and it is not to be construed as a commitment by the Government to enter a contract, nor will the Government pay for the information submitted in response to this request. All information contained in this RFI is preliminary and is subject to change if, and when, a solicitation is issued… (show all)

. Responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by the U.S. Government to form a binding contract, and unsolicited proposals will not be accepted. It is the responsibility of the interested parties to monitor this site for additional information pertaining to this RFI, or future solicitations. 1. Purpose The United States Coast Guard Office of Rapid Response and Prototyping (CG-RAPTOR) invites industry to submit information on mature, operationally relevant technologies that could strengthen the Coastal Sentinel capability portfolio. Based on the responses, the Coast Guard intends to down-select to no more than ten companies to participate in an invitation-only Coastal Sentinel Industry Day the afternoon of 29 September 2026 in San Diego, California. The Government may select fewer than ten companies at its discretion. The objective is to identify technologies that can be evaluated rapidly with operators, integrated with existing or emerging maritime data and command-and-control workflows, and transitioned at a pace consistent with urgent operational needs. A response may address one technology area or an integrated solution spanning multiple areas. The Government is especially interested in solutions that are already demonstrated in relevant environments, can show measurable operational value, and can be presented or demonstrated on the event date without significant Government-funded development. 2. Background CG-RAPTOR is the Coast Guard's Office of Rapid Response and Prototyping. It brings operators, industry, and Government stakeholders together to test proven innovative concepts, evaluate real-world effectiveness, and close urgent operational gaps through rapid learning and prototyping. Coastal Sentinel is the Coast Guard's next-generation maritime surveillance, command-and-control, and communications capability. It is intended to help operators sense maritime activity, make sense of diverse data, and act through a data-rich common operating picture. This RFI focuses on technologies that can improve the quality, persistence, integration, and operational usefulness of maritime sensing and analytics. 3. Industry Day Overview 3.1 Date and Location Date: Tuesday, 29 September 2026. Location: San Diego, California. The exact venue, access procedures, parking information, and any facility restrictions will be provided to invited participants. The venue is anticipated to be at a site near Imperial Beach, CA. Attendance will be limited and controlled by the Government. 3.2 Planned Format Afternoon Demonstrations, technical presentations, and operator exchanges by the companies selected through this RFI. Each selected company will receive a scheduled slot; exact duration and set-up instructions will be provided in the invitation. Vendors should expect an approximately 30-minute time slot. Event Close Government observations, next steps, and administrative wrap-up. Participation does not imply endorsement, qualification, or a commitment to acquire the demonstrated technology. The event is expected to be unclassified. The Government will not accept classified information, Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI), or export-controlled technical data in response to this notice. Additional handling restrictions for the event will be provided to selected participants. 4. Technology Areas of Interest The Coast Guard seeks mature technologies in the following four areas. The examples are illustrative and are not intended to exclude other approaches that directly address the stated operational objective. 4.1 Mature Integration with the Team Awareness Kit Ecosystem Technologies should demonstrate functioning, mature integration with the Team Awareness Kit (TAK) ecosystem rather than an integration roadmap alone. Relevant integrations may include ATAK, WinTAK, TAK Server, Cursor-on-Target data exchange, TAK plugins, or other applicable TAK components and services. Responses should describe the integration that exists today, the environment in which it has been tested or deployed, and the operational functions enabled. Bidirectional exchange of tracks, detections, alerts, imagery, tasking, or other mission data, as applicable. Demonstrated interoperability with relevant TAK clients, servers, plugins, application programming interfaces, and data standards. Operation in disconnected, intermittent, limited-bandwidth, or degraded-network conditions. Identity, access control, data-sharing, federation, audit, and cybersecurity features appropriate to operational use. Evidence of operational deployment, user testing, integration testing, or repeatable laboratory demonstration. 4.2 Improved Maritime Tracks and Detections Technologies should improve the quality and operational usefulness of maritime tracks and detections beyond basic position reporting. Areas of interest include: Multi-source track correlation; Sensor fusion; Confidence scoring; Identity resolution; Track history and behavior; Kinematic analysis; Anomaly detection; Sensor provenance; Alert generation; and Data enrichment for operational decision-making. 4.3 Alternatives or Complements to Traditional Long-Range Electro-Optical/Infrared Sensing The Government is interested in technologies that expand maritime awareness, persistence, or coverage while reducing cost, manpower, or operational burden. Areas of interest include: High-altitude balloons; Uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) deployed from or integrated with uncrewed surface vessels (USVs); Maritime buoys; Distributed sensing architectures; Lower-cost wide-area sensing approaches; Persistent or semi-persistent maritime coverage; and Systems that increase coverage while reducing cost or operational burden. 4.4 Mature Full-Motion Video and Computer Vision for Maritime Operations Technologies should apply mature full-motion video (FMV), computer vision, or related machine-learning models to maritime operational needs. Areas of interest include: Maritime object detection; Vessel classification; Activity recognition; Pattern-of-life analysis; Anomaly detection; Automated cueing; AI-assisted watch standing; Model outputs integrated into the common operating picture; Confidence scoring; and Operator feedback loops for validation, correction, and model improvement. 5. Desired Maturity and Cross-Cutting Attributes The Coast Guard is seeking demonstration-ready capabilities, not basic research or marketing-only concepts. Respondents should state the Technology Readiness Level (TRL), commercial maturity, or equivalent evidence of readiness. Preference may be given to technologies that have been tested in a relevant environment, have current users or customers, or can provide repeatable performance evidence. Across all technology areas, the Government values the following attributes: Clear operational utility and a measurable improvement over current practice; Modular architecture, documented interfaces, and practical integration pathways; Operation at the edge and under constrained communications conditions; Transparent confidence measures, data provenance, explainability, and operator control; Cybersecurity, identity, access-control, logging, and data-governance features appropriate to the intended environment; Human-centered design that reduces workload and supports rapid operator comprehension; Scalability, affordability, maintainability, and reduced train

Recent Agency Awards (Loose Match)

1963 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Coast Guard), any industry: a loose match.

Loose match: same agency, any industry. Read the titles before treating these as competitors.

Single-winner award sizes (1954): middle half $30K to $218K, median $70K; range $440 to $3.5B.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
AIRBUS DS MILITARY AIRCRAFT, INC.85$6.9MSep 16, 2026
SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION · $LMT · $77.0B56$32.2MSep 21, 2026
LEONARDO S.P.A. Roma 00195 ITA40$8.7MSep 17, 2026
QUALITY AEROPARTS, INC.34$2.8MSep 10, 2026
SHERWOOD AVIONICS AND ACCESSORIES, INC.30$7.8MSep 17, 2026
Airbus Helicopters, Inc.25$8.7MSep 10, 2026
JAG INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC23$29.6MSep 17, 2026
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. · $HON · $38.1B23$5.3MSep 18, 2026
CLAYTON INTERNATIONAL, INC.23$1.9MSep 18, 2026
GE AVIATION SYSTEMS LLC18$2.0MAug 20, 2026

Value counts new single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling (same contract, or the same office, day and amount); that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Contract modifications are not new awards and are not added in either (1 here). Revenue next to a ticker is the company's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings.

Investor context
  • $LMT reported $77.0B revenue (12 months to Jun 28, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 1954 past awards, $70K, is under 0.1% of that. SEC filing
  • $HON reported $38.1B revenue (12 months to Jun 30, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 1954 past awards, $70K, is under 0.1% of that. SEC filing

One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 0 of these past winners lobbied U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) since 2024 (0 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) job
  • $656K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Homeland Security, House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 433 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 2 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 3 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name, including the subsidiaries a company lists in its SEC filings. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.