Sources SoughtPosted Jul 30, 2026·Original deadline passed (Aug 12). See latest amendment for current deadline.

DE01--ECO Enterprise Service Desk (ESD) Tier One Support - RFI (VA-26-00084022)

Veterans Affairs · TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION CENTER NJ (36C10B)

Stage
Early notice (sources sought, presolicitation or special notice)
NAICS
541512
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
36C10B26Q0700
Set-aside
None stated
PSC
DE01
Place
Not stated
Contact
Andrea Caltabilota (Andrea.caltabilota@va.gov)
Loading your pipeline and notes…
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation 36C10B26Q0700 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
  • Jul 30, 2026
    Sources Sought
    Open
  • Jul 30, 2026 · this notice
    Sources Sought
Solicitation
None posted
Award
Not yet. Expected award: Any day (median passed). Typical range Aug 17, 2026 to Nov 10, 2026; middle Sep 27, 2026.
Measured from 19 past early notices at Veterans Affairs, Department of with NAICS 541512 that later posted an award (middle half of cases, counted from Jul 30, 2026).

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
  • Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
  • Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.

What the notice says

Request for Information Enterprise Service Desk (ESD) Tier One Support VA-26-00084022 Introduction This Request for Information (RFI) is for planning purposes only and shall not be considered an Invitation for Bid, Request for Task Execution Plan, Request for Quotation or a Request for Proposal. Additionally, there is no obligation on the part of the Government to acquire any products or services described in this RFI. Your response to this RFI will be treated only as information for the Government to consider. You will not be entitled to payment for direct or indirect costs that you incur in … (show all)

responding to this RFI. This request does not constitute a solicitation for proposals or the authority to enter into negotiations to award a contract. No funds have been authorized, appropriated or received for this effort. Interested parties are responsible for adequately marking proprietary, restricted or competition sensitive information contained in their response. The Government does not intend to pay for the information submitted in response to this RFI. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) for this requirement is 541512 with a size standard of $34 million. 2. Submittal Information: All responsible sources may submit a response in accordance with the below information. There is a page limitation for this RFI of 15 pages. The Government will not review any other information or attachments included, that are in excess of the 15-page limit. NO MARKETING MATERIALS ARE ALLOWED AS PART OF THIS RFI. Generic capability statements will not be accepted or reviewed. Your response must address capabilities specific to the services required in the attached PWS and must include the following: Interested Vendors shall at a minimum, provide the following information in the initial paragraph of the submission: Name of Company Address Point of Contact Phone Number Fax Number Email address Company Business Size and Status For VOSB and SDVOSBs, proof of SBA certification. SDVOSB/VOSB vendors that have not been certified by SBA should not respond to this notice. NAICS code(s) Socioeconomic data Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number Existing Contractual Vehicles (GWAC, FSS, or MAC) Provide a summary of your capability to meet the requirements contained within the draft PWS for the following areas: Provide a summary of your technical capability to meet the PWS requirements. Describe how you will incorporate AI-generated post-interaction summaries and real-time knowledge surfacing into agent workflow, training, and coaching. Include your QA approach for identifying and correcting inaccurate or incomplete AI-generated content before it becomes part of the permanent ticket record. Describe how you will capture reductions in wrap-up time and handle time attributable to AI/automation tooling within your staffing and scheduling model, including the timeframe in which you expect to realize measurable staffing efficiency. Describe any AI or automation capabilities you propose to build and operate independently of the Contact Center Infrastructure platform (e.g., internal workforce forecasting/scheduling, agent coaching analytics, ticket triage or escalation routing, internal QA sampling). For each, describe the data sources required and whether those sources are available to you today. As agentic AI and self-service resolve a growing share of standard transaction types, describe how your staffing model, agent skill mix, and training approach will evolve to reflect a contact mix increasingly concentrated on complex or exception cases. Describe your approach to handling escalations from agentic AI or self-service to a live agent, including how you will measure and report "AI-attempted then escalated" contacts distinctly from contacts handled entirely by an agent. Describe how your proposed pricing structure will adjust as contact volume and contact complexity shift over the period of performance in response to AI-driven deflection and self-resolution. Include any built-in review or repricing mechanisms. Describe your staffing elasticity model and redeployment/retention approach for affected personnel as automation reduces agent-handled contact volume over time. Provide a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM), including projected labor categories, labor hours, estimated quantities, unit pricing, and any additional anticipated costs, to meet the Government's requirements. Please include assumptions used to develop the ROM, including if commercial pricing is available for any of the services. Corporate experience or expertise in performing these services and specific examples or references. Specific examples or references provided must include the agency, point of contact, dollar value, and contract number. For SDVOSB/VOSB vendors: Your company s intent and ability to meet the set aside requirement in accordance with VAAR 852.219-73 (JAN 2023) (DEVIATION) VA Notice of Total Set-Aside For Certified SDVOSBs and 13 CFR §125.6, which states the contractor will not pay more than 50% of the amount paid by the government to the prime for contract performance to firms that are not� certified� SDVOSBs� listed in the SBA certification database� (excluding direct costs to the extent they are not the principal purpose of the acquisition and the SDVOSB/VOSB does not provide the service, such as airline travel, cloud computing services, or mass media purchases). When a contract includes both services and supplies, the 50 percent limitation shall apply only to the service portion of the contract. Your response shall include information as to available personnel and financial resources; full names of proposed team members and the PWS requirements planned to be subcontracted to them, which must include the prime planned percentage or the names of the potential team members that may be used to fulfill the set aside requirement. Has the draft PWS provided sufficient detail to describe the technical requirements that encompass the software development and production operations support services to be performed under this effort. ______ YES _______ NO (if No, answer question f) If NO , please provide your technical comments/recommendations on elements of the draft PWS that may contribute to a more accurate proposal submission and efficient, cost effective effort. Responses are due no later than 9:00AM ET, Thursday, August 13, 2026 via email to Andrea Caltabilota, Contract Specialist at Andrea.Caltabilota@va.gov, and Julia Renna, Contract Specialist at Julia.Renna@va.gov. Please note Enterprise Service Desk (ESD) Tier One Support in the subject line of your response. Mark your response as Proprietary Information if the information is considered business sensitive. The email file size shall not exceed 5 MB.

Who won similar work

20 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same office (TECHNOLOGY ACQUISITION CENTER NJ (36C10B)), same NAICS 541512.

Single-winner award sizes (18): middle half $1.9M to $6.9M, median $4.3M; range $280K to $385.4M.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
CIVITASDX LLC5$14.0MJan 13, 2026
PAR EXCELLENCE SYSTEMS, INC3$58.2MSep 30, 2026
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. · $PLTR · $6.2B1$385.4MOct 9, 2025
DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP1$199.9MOct 16, 2026
DOCUMENT STORAGE SYSTEMS INC1$13.1MJun 6, 2025
VERTICAL DESIGN INC.1$7.1MSep 8, 2026
TAYLOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC.1$6.2MAug 26, 2025
PERATON INC.1$3.2MMay 19, 2025
REEFPOINT GROUP LLC1$2.0MOct 8, 2026
MAG DEFENSE LLC1$1.8MJan 23, 2025

Value counts new single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling (same contract, or the same office, day and amount); that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Contract modifications are not new awards and are not added in either (2 here). Revenue next to a ticker is the company's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings.

Investor context
  • $PLTR reported $6.2B revenue (12 months to Jun 30, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 18 past awards, $4.3M, is under 0.1% of that. SEC filing

One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 2 of these past winners lobbied Veterans Affairs, Dept of (VA) since 2024 (8 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Veterans Affairs, Dept of (VA) job
  • $11K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 2 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 25 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 1 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 12 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name, including the subsidiaries a company lists in its SEC filings. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.