SPECIAL NOTICE: 91st Cyber Operations Center Progressive-Design-Build OT

ing a qualifications-based PDB model. Unlike traditional design-bid-build or fixed-price-design-build, PDB is a collaborative, two-phase delivery method designed to optimize design, cost, and schedule alignment for complex projects. This process is defined by two distinct phases under a signed contract: Phase 1 (Design and Preconstruction Services): After selecting a Company to serve as the progressive design-build team (Design-Builder and Design of Record) based on qualifications and experience, not a final price, the Government, Company, and the end-user work as an integrated team. This phase focuses on collaboratively developing the project design from an early concept to a sufficiently detailed level (typically 60-90% completion). Throughout this phase, the Company provides an open-book cost estimates, constructability reviews, and value engineering to progressively algin the project scope with the budget. Phase 2 (Final Design and Construction): Once the design is advanced to an agreed-upon level of completion, the Company submits a commercial proposal, often a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP), for the final design and construction work. If the Government and the Company agree on the price and schedule, the contract is modified to authorize Phase 2. If an agreement cannot be reached, the Government has an �off-ramp� option to take the completed design and procure the construction work via other means. This progressive approach is intended to leverage the builder�s expertise early, reduce risk by identifying challenges before construction begins, and provide greater cost certainty and budget control. I. INDUSTRY DAY USACE intends to conduct an Industry Day on 06 October 2026 from 0900 - 1100 to provide an overview of the project, acquisition strategy, and anticipated requirements. This event will provide interested parties with an opportunity to gain additional insight into the project and proposed Progressive Design-Build (PDB) approach under an Other Transaction (OT) framework, ask questions, and provide input in advance of the solicitation release. General questions from industry participants will be permitted during the Industry Day; however, all discussions and responses provided during the event are considered unofficial and are for informational purposes only. Statements made during the Industry Day do not constitute a commitment, authorization, or binding guidance related to the future Program Solicitation. Official Questions and Answers (Q&A) will be accepted and addressed following the release of the Program Solicitation. Location: TSA Canine Training Center, 2700 Craw Avenue, Building 7337 Lackland Air Force Base, TX 78236 Registration Instruction: Please RSVP by notifying the individuals below and attaching the base pass access form by 25 September 2026. For the base access form, please fill out the boxes in Section IV only. This location is on a military location and base access for every attendee is mandatory. Base access forms must be submitted on time to meet required timeline by the security office. POC: SFC Jordan Kennedy, jordan.l.kennedy@usace.army.mil; Heather Groff, heather.groff@usace.army.mil. Link: https://forms.osi.apps.mil/r/LNLJG11jPf II. PROJECT OVERVIEW Project Title: 91st Cyber Operations Center Location: Joint Base San Antonio - Lackland AFB, Texas Agency: Air Force NAICS Code: 236220 Type of Award: Other Transaction Agreement (OTA), Progressive Design Build (PDB), with a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP), Part A award for Design Efforts and Part B option for Construction. Programmed Amount: $96,000,000 III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Construct a Cyberspace Operations Center in support of Air Combat Command�s 91st Cyber Operations Squadron worldwide missions. The construction will include reinforced concrete foundations, structural steel framing, brick masonry exterior walls, and metal standing seam roofing on metal decking. The project will include fire suppression system, integrated lightning suppression system, as well as all supporting facilities such as site improvements, utilities, communications, access roads, parking areas and (2) generators in support of critical infrastructure to provide a complete and usable facility. Additionally, the project will include secure spaces that shall comply with Intelligence Community Directive 503/705 criteria and standards. Generators are authorized in accordance with Air Force Manual 32-1062, Electrical Systems, Power Plants, and Generators. Facilities will be designed as permanent construction in accordance with Department of War Unified Facilities Criteria 1-200-01, General Building Requirements. This project will comply with Department of War antiterrorism/force protection requirements per Unified Facilities Criteria 4-010-01. IV. ACQUISITION STRATEGY - PRE-AWARD The USACE will use a streamlined competitive selection process: Step 1 � Request for Qualifications/White Papers: Interested parties will submit a Statement of Qualifications (max 20 pages). This initial step serves as a rapid down-select to identify a short list of the most credible and experienced Offerors. Action: A public solicitation will be posted on SAM.gov, issuing a Request for White Papers. Offerors will be required to respond with a concise, qualifications-based White Paper, not to exceed approximately 20 pages. Focus: The White Paper will demonstrate the Offeror's corporate experience with projects of similar integrated acquisition strategy, size and complexity, highlight the qualifications of key personnel, and articulate their understanding of the PDB process and the project's unique technical challenges. Timeline: The submission window will be compressed to an aggressive 30-day period to maintain procurement momentum and attract agile, responsive partners. The government intends to down-select up to three Companies to proceed to the next step. Step 2 � Pitches: Selected Companies will participate in pitch meetings. This step is the cornerstone of the evaluation, moving beyond a paper-based assessment to a direct evaluation of the team's expertise, problem-solving abilities, and collaborative chemistry. Action: After a rapid evaluation of the White Papers submission responses, the Government will invite up to three most qualified Companies to participate in mandatory, one-on-one pitch meetings. Purpose: These are not standard, one-way presentations. They are structured, interactive Q&A sessions designed to simulate the real-world working environment of a Progressive Design-Build project. The Government will engage the Company in an active dialogue to evaluate how effectively the Company and key partners communicate with the Government and with one another. Additionally, the session will test the team's agility, responsiveness, and collaborative problem-solving capabilities when presented with shifting project requirements in real time. Evaluation Criteria: This critical event allows the Government to assess the team�s true collaborative capabilities, depth of technical expertise, and overall "fit" for the PDB partnership; qualities that cannot be adequately judged from a written proposal alone. Final Selection: Most Qualified Determination and Award The selection decision will be made swiftly following the conclusion of the pitch meetings. Action: The Government will make a final selection decision based on a holistic, most