Commercial Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Solutions Request for Information (RFI)
Army Contracting Command (ACC) · W6QK ACC-APG
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation W56KGY-26-PNT-0002 in this department, oldest first.
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
Commercial Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Solutions Request for Information (RFI) **Revision made on 19:11 on 29 January 2026 to update attachement** I. Introduction This Request for Information (RFI) will enable the Project Manager Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PM PNT) to identify vendors with the ability to provide commercially available, M-Code Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) solutions for mounted vehicles. The term �commercial solution� for the purposes of this RFI is defined in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 2.101 under Commercial product and may include … (show all)
non-developmental items. This RFI will influence PM PNT�s decision regarding the procurement method of the technologies, if a requirement materializes, for future PNT capability on Army mounted platforms. Based on the responses to this RFI, the Government is considering a variety of acquisition strategies and contract vehicles to include: FAR 17.8, Reverse Auctions; Commercial Solutions Openings; FAR 12, Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services; FAR 16.5, Indefinite-Delivery Contracts; and FAR 14, Sealed Bidding, for any potential future requirements. To maximize flexibility and foster a competitive environment, the Government may choose to utilize any single existing authority or any combination of authorities. II. Purpose The purpose of the RFI is to understand industry capabilities for commercially available, non-developmental (production ready within 90 days), M-Code solutions compliant with the Defense Advanced GPS Receiver (DAGR) A-Kit (mount) and DAGR space claim within mounted vehicles. This solution must be both cost efficient and effective. Information submitted will help shape the strategy for future PNT materiel solutions for mounted platforms. Emphasis is being placed on affordable solutions that can leverage existing integrations on Army vehicles to reduce the overall cost and schedule associated with fielding a potential future capability. III. Problem Statement Adversary GPS denial and deception efforts pose unique challenges to systems and platforms?dependent on GPS for PNT information.?Mounted?platforms require the ability to effectively?operate?and navigate through a wide variety of challenging?environments. The ever-changing threat and advancement of capabilities and technologies requires a cost-efficient, adaptive acquisition approach with a design that leverages existing integration strategies to allow for rapid deployment on a large scale. IV. Required Capabilities and Requested information ACC-APG is seeking answers to the following questions. 1. Commercial M-Code Solution: Do you have a commercial M-Code product that fits within the DAGR power and space claim and is available for purchase by the U.S. Government (USG) today? 2. Please provide a short description of your commercial M-Code solution and any additional leveraged technologies. 3. What is your assessment of the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of your solution? Please list a sample of test events that you have participated in to support this assessment. 4. Current Contract Vehicle: Is your product currently available on a government contract? If so, please provide the contract number. If not, describe your product's primary applications and customer base. Please include the types of industries you serve and the specific problems your product solves for them. This can include examples from commercial or Government clients. If the Government is the intended customer, please provide relevant information on what missions the product is meant to address. 5. Unit Cost: Please provide an estimate of the cost of the Commercial M-Code solution if purchased in the quantities per year listed in Table 1. If there are more relevant breakpoints in your pricing structure, please include that information as well, while maintaining estimates for the quantities in Table 1. All cost estimates should be provided assuming that the government will provide the M-Code GPS receiver as Government Furnished Equipment (GFE). If the vendor chooses not to leverage GFE for the M-Code receiver, please break out the cost of the receiver as a separate line item to enable clear analysis of your data. DO NOT include the cost of the antenna within this pricing information. Table 1:Cost Estimate Request Quantity Per Year Price Per Unit 500 1,000 2,000 5,000 10,000 6. Multi-Year Contract: In accordance with Table 2, would the price of the solution be further reduced if the Government pursued a multi-year contract vehicle in accordance with FAR 17.1? If yes, please provide multi-year unit pricing. Table 2: Cost Estimate Request for Multi-year Contract Award Quantity Per Year Price Per Unit 500 1,000 2,000 5,000 10,000 7. AJAS Unit Cost: PM PNT is also interested in the cost of AJAS systems that the respondent offers with their commercial M-code solution. Please provide a cost breakout for each AJAS model in accordance with Table 1. If there are more relevant breakpoints in your pricing structure, please include that information as well, while maintaining estimates for the quantities in Table 1. Please delineate between the performance, features, or types of AJAS models (e.g. 4 element vs. 7 element, etc.). 8. AJAS Interoperability: Is your commercial M-Code solution capable of operating with various AJAS�s without significant loss of functionality? If so, please list the AJAS�s that you have successfully tested with. 9. Lead Time and Production: What is the standard lead time for production of units at 1,000 per year? Does the respondent have a production line currently operating for the solution and what is the current monthly capacity? Does the respondent have any applicable higher level quality management certifications, for example the ISO 9000 family? 10. Compatible with DAGR A-Kits: As designed today, is your solution compatible with the DAGR A-kit cables? If additional information is needed to understand the connectors associated with the DAGR A-kit, please see section V to request the information. 11. Number of Client Systems Supported: Please provide the number of independent client systems that your system can support. Please break this out by number and type of serial ports. 12. Environmental Testing: What environmental and Electro Magnetic Interference (EMI) testing has been conducted on your solution? Please provide any specific information about MIL standards or commercial standards that your solution meets. 13. Warranty: What warranty coverage and duration is provided as part of the base unit cost provided in answer to question #5. Please also include any additional warranty options and costs. 14. Repair Turn-Around Time: What is the average repair turn-around time for the unit? 15. Average Repair Cost: What is the average repair cost of the unit as a percentage of the unit cost procured at quantity 500 per year? 16. What level/kind of Technical Drawings, operating manuals, and training would the respondent provide with the delivery of the solution? Are these included in the unit costs or are they separate? If Separate, please outline how the contractor would provide these to the Government. V. Requesting the DAGR A-kit information To request information about the DAGR A-kit, please send the following information to the POCs listed below. This is only necessary if you request information about the DAGR A-kit. a. Company Name b. Company Point of Contact c. Mailing Address and Website d. CAGE Code e. Unique ID # (assigned by SAM.gov) f. Location of facility(s) g. Is your company foreign-owned, either directly or indirectly? If so, what is the country of origin and is the company fully or partially owned? h. Does your organization have access to store Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)? If so, does your organization have a Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC)? Please identify CMMC level. j. Does a member within your organization have a Common Access Card, with an ac
Who won similar work
2 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same office (W6QK ACC-APG), same NAICS 334511.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| TELEDYNE FLIR DEFENSE, INC. | 1 | $74.2M | Feb 19, 2025 |
| CHEMRING SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC. | 1 | $48.8M | Jul 16, 2026 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.
- Jul 16, 2026CHEMRING SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC.$48.8MNotice of Sole Source Award and Redacted J&A: JBTDS
- Feb 19, 2025TELEDYNE FLIR DEFENSE, INC.$74.2MNuclear Biological Chemical Reconnaissance Vehicle (NBCRV) Sensor Suite Upgrade (SSU) Capability Set 2.2 (CS2.2)
Competitive landscape
For the 2 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 0 of these past winners lobbied Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers) or Army, Dept of (Other) or Natl Guard since 2024 (0 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers) or Army, Dept of (Other) or Natl Guard job
- No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 0 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.