Next Generation Mounted Family of Computer Systems (MFoCS) Request for Information (RFI)
Army Contracting Command (ACC) · W6QK ACC-APG
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation W15P7T-26-R-MFC2 in this department, oldest first.
- Jul 13, 2026 · this noticeSources Sought
- Jul 24, 2026Sources SoughtOpen
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
Next Generation Mounted Family of Computer Systems (MFoCS) Request for Information (RFI) 1. DESCRIPTION: The U.S. Army Project Manager Command & Control Infrastructure (PM C2I), Product Manager Mounted Command & Control (PdM MC2), and the Army Contracting Command � Aberdeen Proving Ground (ACC�APG) is conducting market research to request industry�s feedback regarding Commercial Off-the-Shelf (COTS) or Non-Developmental Items (NDIs) that are readily available as potential solutions for Mounted Family of Computers (MFoCS). The MFoCS capability has a heritage of providing ruggedized computing po… (show all)
wer to over 100,000 Army vehicles and tactical operation centers, building upon capabilities and lessons learned over two (2) decades. MFoCS represents a line of highly modular, cyber-hardened family of tactical computing and display systems designed to consolidate warfighting applications onto a single hardware platform for ground combat vehicles and command posts. These systems incorporate next-generation processing technologies, featuring high-definition multi-touch displays, expanded Random Access Memory (RAM), and higher-capacity solid-state storage. Building on this foundation, the MFoCS is mission-critical to the Army's Next Generation Command and Control (NGC2) strategy. As the essential hardware backbone for mounted platforms, its core purpose is to enable decision advantage by processing complex data streams in real-time and powering the advanced software and systems necessary for information superiority in a multi-domain environment THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION: This RFI is issued solely for information and planning purposes � it does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP), Request for Quotation (RFQ), Invitation for Bid (IFB), or a promise to issue a RFP in the future. This RFI does not commit the Government to contract for any supply or service whatsoever. The Government is not seeking proposals and will not accept unsolicited proposals. Respondents are advised that the Government will not pay for any information or administrative costs incurred in responding to this RFI; all costs associated with responding to this RFI will be solely at the interested parties� expense. Proprietary information shall NOT be submitted. The Government shall not be liable for, or suffer, any consequential damages for any improperly identified proprietary information. Not responding to this RFI does not preclude participation in any future RFP, if issued. If an RFP is released, it will be synopsized on the Sam.gov website. It is the responsibility of interested parties to monitor this site for additional information pertaining to this requirement. All material submitted in response to this RFI must be unclassified. 2. RFI Responses Company Profile: The response should describe your company's core business and include the following: a. Company name, company address, points-of-contact information, including name, phone number, and e-mail address, Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code, Unique Entity Identification (UEID) number, North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code and current business size. Responses shall be limited to no more than ten (10) pages for the entire submission (not inclusive of company information and attached charts). b. Responses are due no later than (NLT) 27 Jul 2026 at 2:00 PM, Eastern Standard Time (EST) and must be submitted via e-mail only to the Government Points of Contact (POCs): Sharon Peterson, Contracting Officer, at sharon.a.peterson15.civ@army.mil and Nicholas Budnichuk, Contract Specialist, at nicholas.d.budnichuk.civ@army.mil. 3. RFI Questionnaire: INFORMATIONAL NOTE: An interface control document may be provided as part of this request. The information contained in it is classified as critical technical information and, therefore, access will be granted once the respondent has been cleared to receive (instructions below). It is expected that some responding parties may not be granted access to the controlled documents released with this RFI. In the event that access is not granted, responses are still encouraged and offerors must describe how their solution can survive extremely harsh environments inherent to U.S. Army combat platforms while meeting mission requirements. a. Please provide a brief overview of your company, including years in business, relevant experience in ruggedized/military computing, and key customers. How do you mitigate risks related to RAM and other critical component shortages? What is your typical lead time for delivery after order placement? Can you provide information on your supply chain partners and sourcing strategies? b. Is your solution COTS or NDI? 1) If NDI, provide the status of your solution? (e.g. Design, Prototype, Production, etc.) 2) If NDI, is it available to the public or Government-only? c. Is your proposed solution fully compliant with the technology sourcing restrictions of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), specifically Section 889 of the FY 2019 NDAA (telecommunications/surveillance restrictions) and Section 5949 of the FY 2023 NDAA (semiconductor sourcing restrictions)? d. Describe how your product is compliant with the environmental survivability and reliability requirements for mounted internal vehicular devices described in the Mounted Mission Command (MMC) Environmental and Quality Control Specification v1.5. 1) Describe whether your product has been tested to the specific procedures and passed, any comparable tests and procedures that have been conducted instead, and the roadmap to compliance for those that have not yet been completed. 2) Note that the MMC Environmental and Quality Control Specification v1.5 references documents such as ATPD 2404B. These documents will not be provided with this RFI and it is understood that responses are unlikely to adequately address those specific references. e. Describe the cyber maturity of the device, such as Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS)-140, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 800-171, NIST Special Publication 800-53. 1) Describe whether your product supports Sensitive but Unclassified � Encrypted Data (SBU-E) and SECRET data. 2) Describe any additional security considerations or capabilities in your product. 3) Describe whether your product is capable of handling both Secret and controlled unclassified information (CUI) data and whether your product has the ability to remove secret data when switching between classifications. f. Describe how your product complies with the provided Interface Control Document to enable the system to be a drop in replacement for the existing MFoCS product. Be sure to include technical specifications such as computing power, RAM, Global Positioning System (GPS), and WiFi. g. Describe whether (or how) your product provides a Military GPS capability? 1) Describe how keys are loaded, stored, and protected. 2) Describe if your GPS capability is assured? h. Describe the size (with dimension, weight, power, and cooling requirements for your device? 1) Include description of active or passive cooling and any venting. 2) Power description should include voltage, current load, and wattage in nominal, and peak load conditions. Duration of peak power load should also be provided. i. Describe the compute performance of your solution. j. Describe whether your solution offers the following or comparable: 1) Trusted Platform Module (TPM) 2.0 2) Two hard drive bays for solid state drives (SSDs) a) Describe how your solution can ensure that data from the SSDs shall be retained on the compute platform once removed. k. What is the cost of your product? Include all licensing costs and terms (describe if the necessary licenses can or must be acquired from other sources). Include these costs for a single unit, and at quantities in which bulk discounts apply. l. What is the availability of your product to be procured and at what quantities? m. What is your produ
Who won similar work
7 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Army Contracting Command (ACC)), same product/service code (PSC) 7B22.
Single-winner award sizes (7): middle half $128K to $2.2M, median $389K; range $61K to $10.0B.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| MULTIPLE AWARDEES SEE ATTACHED Fort Belvoir VA USA | 1 | $10.0B | Sep 12, 2025 |
| N+1 TECHNOLOGIES, LLC | 1 | $3.3M | Sep 17, 2026 |
| LOWRY HOLDING CO, INC | 1 | $1.1M | Apr 22, 2025 |
| DH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | 1 | $389K | Apr 30, 2025 |
| GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS INC | 1 | $168K | Feb 10, 2025 |
| BETTER DIRECT, LLC | 1 | $88K | Sep 11, 2026 |
| QUESTIVITY, INC. | 1 | $61K | Aug 22, 2025 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.
- Sep 17, 2026N+1 TECHNOLOGIES, LLC$3.3MSystem Integration Plus (SIP) Greyhound Interim ProcessorsNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Sep 11, 2026BETTER DIRECT, LLC$88KAward Notice and Brand Name Justification - HP - W9124P-26-F-A642No listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Sep 12, 2025MULTIPLE AWARDEES SEE ATTACHED Fort Belvoir VA USA$10.0BITES-4H Multiple IDIQ AwardNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Aug 22, 2025QUESTIVITY, INC.$61KAruba Hardware MaintenanceNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Apr 30, 2025DH TECHNOLOGIES, INC.$389KSYNOPSIS OF AWARD/REDHAT LICENSE SUBSCRIPTION RENEWALNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Apr 22, 2025LOWRY HOLDING CO, INC$1.1MJuniper Mesa 4 Handheld TerminalsNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Feb 10, 2025GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS INC$168KCSN Server Life CycleNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
Competitive landscape
For the 7 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 0 of these past winners lobbied Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers) or Army, Dept of (Other) or Natl Guard since 2024 (0 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Army, Dept of (Corps of Engineers) or Army, Dept of (Other) or Natl Guard job
- No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 0 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.