Loading the records…
Loading the records…
Veterans Affairs · 249-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 9 (36C249)
Veterans Affairs wants bids for "VISN 09 wide Drug Information Electronic Database". The original due date (Mar 6, 2025) has passed; check the latest amendment for the current one. In the last 2 years, similar work went to 6 companies, usually for about $307K per award. An award could come any day: the usual time to award has passed.
Put together from the facts on this page; the details and sources are below.
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Every notice posted under solicitation 36C24925Q0135 in this department, oldest first.
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
eway (CAG) as well as mobile devices (Page 7) Question: Will the solution need to include both a web-based application and a mobile application, or will a responsive web-based interface accessible via mobile devices suffice? A: responsive web-based interface accessible via mobile devices is sufficient 2. Database Updates and Management: RFQ Reference: Database content shall be updated regularly throughout the performance period, at no less than monthly frequency. (Page 7) Questions: Will the contractor be responsible for data migration, creating a new database, or merging updates into an existing database? A: N/A Will users have the ability to manipulate or update data through the application, or is access read-only? A: N/A How large is the existing database schema? A: I don t have an answer to this. Will blob storage be required (e.g., PDFs, Word documents, image files)? A: N/A Is there an estimated number of end users utilizing the product simultaneously? A: I don t have an estimate, but no issue with the incumbent contractor. Will we be expected to create, modify, or view database stored procedures? A: N/A 3. Training Format and Delivery: RFQ Reference: Contractor shall provide online training tutorials to users at no additional expense to the government (Page 7) Questions: Are there any VA preferred formats or software suites for training tutorials, such as webinars (Webex), video tutorials, PowerPoint presentations, or interactive assessments? A: No preference Is there a requirement for certifications or assessments upon completion of the training? A: No Category 2: Technical and Infrastructure Requirements 4. Hosting Environment: RFQ Reference: Authorized Office of Information and Technology (OIT) Personnel will conduct all installations locally. (Page 9) Questions: Will the application be hosted on VISN 9 s web servers (e.g., Windows IIS or Apache), or would a cloud-based solution (Azure, AWS) be acceptable? A: N/A If cloud hosting is allowed, are there any preferred cloud service providers or compliance requirements (e.g., FedRAMP)? A: N/A How many hosting environments would be required during the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)? (e.g., Development, Testing, Staging, Production) A: N/A Is it correct to assume that production would be hosted on VISN 9 servers post-code delivery to OIT, or is cloud hosting acceptable for production as well? A: N/A 5. CI/CD Pipeline and Deployment: Question: Is there a preference for delivering the solution via a CI/CD pipeline (e.g., GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps) or as packaged files for on-premises deployment? A: N/A 6. Integration with Existing Systems: Questions: Will the solution need to integrate with any existing VA systems beyond VPN and CAG access, such as Active Directory or Single Sign-On (SSO) systems? A: N/A 7. License and Certification Questions: Micromedex Drug Information Database: Will the Micromedex Drug Information Database be provided by the VA, or is the contractor responsible for procuring the necessary licenses and access for integration? A: N/A If the contractor is responsible, are there any licensing limitations or preferred vendors we should be aware of? A: N/A Additionally, will the database need to be hosted on VA s infrastructure or can it be hosted on a cloud-based platform as part of the proposed solution? A: N/A Does the Micromedex database currently have an existing API that we can leverage for integration, or will the contractor be responsible for developing a new API? A: N/A If an existing API is available, can you provide information on the API documentation, access requirements, and any limitations? A: N/A If a new API is needed, are there any preferred standards or protocols (e.g., REST or GraphQL) that we should follow? A: N/A Category 3: Documentation and Compliance 8. Documentation Requirements: RFQ Reference: Confirmation of Work (Page 9) Questions: Are there specific requirements for pre-deployment documentation (e.g., architecture diagrams, data flow diagrams, engineering documents) and post-deployment documentation (e.g., user manuals, security plans)? A: No Is there a preferred format or template for these documents? A: No 9. Toolsets and Methodology: RFQ Reference: Confirmation of Work (Page 9) Questions: Does the Contracting Officer Representative (COR) have a preferred set of development tools, project management tools (e.g., Jira, Azure DevOps), or CI/CD platforms? A: No If not, can the contractor propose a toolset as part of the solution? A: No 10. Compliance with VA Technical Reference Model (TRM): RFQ Reference: All information Technology (IT) resources required to provide access to electronic reference shall be documented as approved by VA Technical Reference Module (TRM). Question: Are there any specific TRM-approved technologies or security protocols that should be prioritized in the solution? A: No
8 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Veterans Affairs), same product/service code (PSC) 7610.
Single-winner award sizes (8): middle half $35K to $440K, median $307K; range $13K to $744K.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| J.E. FEDERAL ENTERPRISES, LLC. AUBURN 36830-1869 | 2 | $1.1M | Jan 15, 2026 |
| J.E. FEDERAL ENTERPRISES, LLC. AUBURN 36830 | 2 | $658K | Jul 2, 2026 |
| PROQUEST LLC · $CLVT · $2.4B | 1 | $308K | Jan 1, 2025 |
| GRAHAM ADVISORY NETWORK INC | 1 | $306K | Dec 23, 2024 |
| COX SUBSCRIPTIONS, INC. | 1 | $17K | Aug 27, 2026 |
| JOINT COMMISSION RESOURCES, INC. | 1 | $13K | Dec 27, 2024 |
Value counts new single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling (same contract, or the same office, day and amount); that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Contract modifications are not new awards and are not added in either. Notices whose amount is a placeholder such as $999,999,999 are not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings.
One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.
Materiality: one award's value as a share of the winner's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings (or its last fiscal year, as noted when you point at it). Low under 1%, Medium 1 to 5%, High 5% or more. Many awards are paid over several years, so this overstates a single year's share.
For the 6 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name, including the subsidiaries a company lists in its SEC filings. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.