81--SHIPPING AND STORAG

H DISABILITIES (JUN 2020)|2||| TRANSPORTATION OF SUPPLIES BY SEA (JAN 2023)|2||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM-BASIC (FEB 2024)|11|||||||||||| LIMITATION OF LIABILITY--HIGH-VALUE ITEMS (FEB 1997)|1|| LIMITATIONS ON PASS-THROUGH CHARGES (JUN 2020)|1|| NOTICE OF TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SET-ASIDE (OCT 2020)(DEVIATION 2020-O0008)|1|| ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (NOV 2023)|13|||||||||||||| BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024))|5|||||| BUY AMERICAN--BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM (FEB 2024)|1|| ROYALTY INFORMATION (APR 1984)|1|| ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (MAY 2024)|12|336413|1250||||||||||| FACSIMILE PROPOSALS (OCT 1997)|1|| NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, ANDENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008))|2||x| This solicitation is for made new manufacture spare parts. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to theresponsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. In addition to price, the following non-price evaluation factor shall be used to evaluate offers and are listed in descending order of importance. Relevant Past Performance Technical Capability The non-price evaluation factors, when combined, are significantly more important than price. There are no subfactors. The Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government. Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. The Government will consider the quality of an offeror's relevant past performance. This consideration is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer's responsibility determination. The assessment of the offeror's r relevant past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the relative risk of the offeror and other competitors in successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. In determining the rating for the past performance evaluation factor, the Government will give greater consideration to the contracts which the Government feels are most relevant to the RFP. The Government reserves the right to award the contract to other than the lowest priced offeror. Page Limitation-Excluding the cover page, table of contents, past performance project forms the technical capability proposal is limited to fifteen (15) pagesin at least 11pt. font and 1" margins. Pages in excess of this limitation will not be evaluated. The pages excluded from evaluation will be at the discretionof the Agency. Contractors are informed that it is the Government's desire to make award on initial proposals when deemed possible by the Contracting Officer, however the Government reserves the right to communicate and/or negotiate with offerors if later determined necessary. NON-PRICE PROPOSAL (all non-price factors) -The Contractor is required to submit the following non-price information: 1. RELEVANT PAST PERFORMANCE: The Contractor is provided an opportunity to demonstrate relevant past performance on contracts currently being performed or performed within the past three (3) years. The Government will determine relevance by analyzing the scope and magnitude of the reference contracts and comparing them to the instant requirement. The Government reserves the right to evaluate submitted projects individually or in the aggregate in order to determine relevance and will do so consistently across all evaluated offers. The Government will consider the quality of the Contractor's relevant past performance. Reference Contracts: The Contractor may submit up to a maximum of three (3) contracts for evaluation. The Government reserves the right to obtain information from sources other than those identified by the contractor. 2. TECHNICAL CAPABILITY: The government desires that offerors demonstrate technical capability to satisfy the government's requirements. The offeror's response will be evaluated to determine whether its response poses risk to performance or whether it will result in better value to the government. In response to this Evaluation Factor, offerors shall address its Manufacturing Equipment; Inspection Method Sheets; Incoming Inspection Sheets; Process Sheets; Quality System Compliance; Welding Certification. In responding to the above areas of the technical capability factor, it is incumbent upon the offeror to provide a level of detail that demonstrates to the Government's satisfaction that the offeror has the technical capability to perform the requirement. If the proposal lacks sufficient detail, it may result in the government assessing risk in the proposal. While there is no prescribed method for demonstrating technical capability, the below are items of interest to the government that the contractor may, at its discretion, address to assist the government in gaining an understanding of the offerors technical capability. Offerors are cautioned that while these areas of interest are not mandatory elements that are required to be addressed, failure to address them or comparable indicia of technical capability, may limit the government's understanding of technical risk and result in the assignment of commensurate risk. Offerors are alsonotified that some of these indicia of capability are overlapping, i.e., two ormore may evidence the same facet of capability. Certification of possession or access to the following equipment: For Aluminum and Steel Welded Containers, & Bladebox/riveted construction 1. Brake Press 2. Extrusion Dies 3. CNC machining center(s) capable of lathe and/or milling operations Copies of inspection method sheets used in-process and/or at final inspection Copies of incoming inspection documents that show material certificates of conformance, and if applicable, dimensional conformance Process/Operation sheets to show ability to conform to drawing requirements in the following areas: Weld preparation; Welding procedure specifications;Production lot testing Proof of compliance to ISO9001, and/or, AS9100. Applicable up-to-date welder certifications showing highest-level certification obtained AWS D1.1 for steel, AWS D1.2 or MIL-W-22248, Class 4 for aluminum, AWS D1.3 for sheet steel and AWS D1.6 for stainless steel. If the offeror address any or all of the above, or provides comparable indicia of capability, it is encouraged to provide supporting evidence and detail, such as but not limited to receipts, certifications, drawings, test results/ logs, maintenance records, calibration records, inspection reports, audits, etc. The weight accorded to supporting evidence will be at the discretion of the government. The Technical capability proposals will be evaluated to determine the risk of unsuccessful performance as well as relative risk compared to other offerors. For information or questions regarding this notice, please contact Kristin Clemens at the email address: kristin.clemens2.civ@us.navy.mil. NAVSUP WSS Requests proposals submitted in response to this solicitation remain valid for a minimum of 120 days following submission. All contractual documents related to the instant procurement are considered to be "issued" by the Government when cop