Loading the records…
Loading the records…
Department of Defense (all) · OUSD(AT & L)
The Department of Defense is planning to buy "DoD Clause Logic Service". This is an early notice: it is not taking bids yet. The work is in Arlington, VA, USA. The original due date (Dec 5, 2024) has passed; check the latest amendment for the current one. In the last 2 years, similar work went to 10 or more companies, usually for about $395K per award.
Put together from the facts on this page; the details and sources are below.
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Every notice posted under solicitation FY2025DPCAP0001 in this department, oldest first.
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
overnment at this time is preliminary and may be updated or changed prior to a formal release of a Request for Proposal. The Government expects to conduct an industry day subsequent to receiving submittals in response to this notice. Industry day details are included herein. The Government will neither award a contract solely on the basis of this sources sought synopsis (or industry day), nor will it reimburse any contractor/prospective contractor for any costs associated with preparing or submitting a response to this notice (or industry day). The Government has not yet determined the acquisition strategy for this requirement, including whether a small business set-aside strategy is applicable. The Clause Logic Service (CLS) is a software capability that, given a set of inputs, provides extensible markup language (XML) data outputs for Terms and Conditions (Ts&Cs) inclusion in solicitations, awards, and modifications for the Department of Defense and some other Federal agencies. Additional publicly available information about the current CLS capability is published at https://dodprocurementtoolbox.com/site-pages/ebusiness-cls. The Government is seeking to modernize or replace its current Clause Logic Service (CLS) capability using notional concepts in slides attached to this notice. Concepts are shared to encourage dialog with industry, and they are not yet considered final plans or approaches. This market research effort is intended to inform the Government�s future strategy, as a make or buy decision has not yet been made. No acquisition strategy has been determined at this point. The Government is surveying the market for commercially available solutions, nondevelopmental solutions, solutions that may serve as a starting point for further development, business process model platforms that may be leveraged to quickly develop capabilities, and more. The Government is not seeking a complete contract writing system/solution as part of this effort, but rather the Government ultimately intends to make or buy a modular capability that complements contract writing systems. The ultimate solution will need to support multiple configurations for different environments (e.g., stand-alone cloud hosted web application, �headless� service using application programming interfaces to communicate with cloud-hosted contract writing systems, and classified contracting). Respondents must possess the expertise, capabilities, and experience in developing and/or providing the same or similar solutions, meeting all relevant cybersecurity, accessibility, and audit requirements for the Department of Defense. Respondents shall submit a Capabilities Package in response to this sources sought synopsis that demonstrates detailed knowledge and experience in the following areas: DoD procurement processes, including the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) in various contracting methods (e.g., commercial/non-commercial contracts, competitive/sole source solicitations, simplified/complex contracts) for various contracting scenarios (e.g., installation, construction, research and development, expeditionary/contingency, classified, major systems, logistics). Business system design and sustainment within the DoD, including cybersecurity requirements. DoD data standard structures, including the Procurement Data Standard (PDS). Integration with cloud hosted contract writing system platforms such as the Department of the Air Force�s CON-IT, the Department of the Army�s Army Contract Writing System (ACWS), the Department of the Navy�s Electronic Procurement System (ePS), and the Fourth Estate�s Electronic Contract Writing Module (ECWM). Section 508 requirements, W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines and Web Accessibility Initiative-Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA), and modern user interface/user experience design practices for web applications such as those listed at https://digital.gov/resources/checklist-of-requirements-for-federal-digital-services/. Any current or previous clause logic capability (or similar) matching one or more sources of functional data inputs (interview question responses, data from the procurement data standard, etc.) with a rules-based logic engine to accurately provide predictable outputs. Integration with Acquisition.gov or other similar data source for XML and/or XHTML representations of terms and conditions. Use of models (e.g., statistical, machine learning, artificial intelligence) to offer inferences on missing or unknown input data elements, with the goal of improving data accuracy while decreasing the time required by users to provide data entry. Capability packages shall also address the following items: Company name, address, point of contact, telephone number, e-mail address, Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code, and Unique Entity Identifier (UEI). Business size (if 8(a) provide proof of certification, etc.) under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541519. Additionally, firms responding to this announcement as the "prime contractor" should indicate whether they are: �other than small business� or �small business� in relation to NAICS code 541519. Firms responding to this announcement as the "prime contractor" should also indicate whether, in relation to NAICS code 541519, they are considered a small disadvantaged business, veteran-owned small business, woman-owned small business, or a Small Business Administration certified Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) program participant as a WOSB concern or Economically Disadvantaged WOSB (EDWOSB) concern, �8(a) program participant�, �service-disabled veteran-owned small business�, or �historically underutilized business zone small business�. Under which NAICS code does your company usually provide supplies identified above? Do you consider a NAICS code other than 541519 to be more appropriate as a classification for the supplies identified above? Please include the rationale for your answer. Overarching description of technical maturity and scalability/configurability of existing solution(s), if applicable. Approach if partial or full development is required. Qualifications and competencies of skilled personnel that may be needed, as required. Expertise and ability to identify specialized skill sets, conduct training to meet these skill sets. Potential business arrangements/models (cost sharing development, product already ready but for sale with licenses, etc.). Intellectual property licensing arrangements for existing capabilities. Responses to this RFI must be received No Later Than 12:00 PM (EST) 5 December 2024. Information packages may be submitted in an Adobe or MS Word compatible format by e-mail to osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.dpc-cb@mail.mil. Include �Clause Logic Service Sources Sought� in the subject line of your email. E-mails to any other address will not be accepted or receive a response. The PCO is the sole point of contact for this notice. Submissions shall not exceed 20-25 pages (8" X 11"). Font shall be 12-pitch with one-inch borders. Industry is encouraged to respond with information not constrained by proprietary data rights; however, if any information submitted is considered proprietary, then the pages containing such information must be marked accordingly. The capabilities package sh
237 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Department of Defense (all)), same NAICS 541519.
Single-winner award sizes (237): middle half $105K to $1.7M, median $395K; range $50 to $11.9B.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| DLT SOLUTIONS, LLC | 11 | $5.1M | Sep 10, 2026 |
| FCN INC | 7 | $6.2M | Aug 13, 2025 |
| CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP | 7 | $3.2M | Sep 30, 2026 |
| NEW TECH SOLUTIONS, INC. | 6 | $1.3M | Oct 28, 2026 |
| SOFTWARE INFORMATION RESOURCE CORP. | 5 | $2.7M | Dec 8, 2025 |
| IMPRES TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC | 4 | $8.0M | Sep 28, 2026 |
| COUNTERTRADE PRODUCTS, INC. | 4 | $6.6M | Jul 10, 2026 |
| M2 TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 4 | $3.6M | Sep 9, 2026 |
| Gartner Incorporated | 4 | $3.2M | Jun 24, 2026 |
| BAHFED CORP | 4 | $2.1M | Sep 22, 2026 |
Value counts new single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling (same contract, or the same office, day and amount); that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Contract modifications are not new awards and are not added in either. Notices whose amount is a placeholder such as $999,999,999 are not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings.
Materiality: one award's value as a share of the winner's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings (or its last fiscal year, as noted when you point at it). Low under 1%, Medium 1 to 5%, High 5% or more. Many awards are paid over several years, so this overstates a single year's share.
For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name, including the subsidiaries a company lists in its SEC filings. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.