Request for Information: United States Coast Guard Core Navigation Software
Coast Guard · C5I CONTRACT OPERATIONS DIVISION 3 (CG-C5I-C3) PORTSMOUTH
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation 70Z04427IOTI32721 in this department, oldest first.
- Sep 23, 2026Sources SoughtOpen
- Sep 23, 2026 · this noticeSources Sought
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
Description & Purpose of Request 1.1 Objective The United States Coast Guard (USCG) is conducting market research in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 10 to identify commercially available off-the-shelf (COTS) and Non-Developmental Item (NDI) core maritime navigation software solutions that have the capability of being enhanced to meet USCG requirements (e.g. EAIS IDD). The primary objective is to survey industry capabilities to inform the prospective modernization and eventual replacement of the legacy USCG �Vega� navigation software suite (currently derived from comme… (show all)
rcial core navigation architectures) across the cutter and boat fleet. 1.2 Purpose & Scope of Market Inquiry The Coast Guard seeks insight into the current commercial and naval navigation software, including cutting-edge display engines, autonomous voyage planning, sensor fusion, resilient Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT), and modern software architectures (e.g., modular open systems, containerized microservices, cross-platform runtimes). The Government intends to assess software suites that can match or exceed the complete operational baseline of current USCG E-NAV capabilities while remaining flexible, open, and capable of integrating seamlessly into existing USCG shipboard hardware configurations without requiring complete bridge refits. 1.3 Disclaimer This is a Request for Information (RFI) and is issued solely for informational, market research, and planning purposes. This is not a Request for Proposals or a Request for Quotations, and it is not considered to be a commitment by the Government to award a contract/order nor is the Government responsible for any costs incurred in furnishing information provided under this RFI. No basis for claim against the Government shall arise as a result of a response to this RFI or Government use of any information provided. Further, the Government is not seeking proposals and will not accept unsolicited proposals at this time. No classified, confidential, or sensitive information should be included in your response to this RFI. Proprietary information must be clearly marked if included. The Government reserves the right to use any information provided by respondents for any purpose deemed necessary and legally appropriate, including using technical information provided by respondents in any resultant solicitation. Responses will assist the Government in determining the availability of potential solutions and commercial products in the market. At this time, no solicitation exists; therefore, please do not request a copy of the solicitation. The information and requirements in this RFI, and any attachments, is subject to change at the sole discretion of the Government. 2. Operational Environment & Hardware Baseline Constraints To ensure candidate software solutions can integrate into active cutter classes without widespread structural or electrical bridge overhauls, respondents must demonstrate compatibility with the following operational constraints: 2.1 Installed Hardware Baseline (E-NAV) The USCG fleet operates on a variety of IEC 60945 compliant hardware baselines consisting of: rack mounted industrial computers, rack mounted servers, ruggedized small factor computers, marine-grade All-in-One (AIO) Computer/Displays, system displays ranging from 15-19 inches, KVM matrix, ruggedized mouse and keyboard. 2.2 Operating System (OS) Gatekeeper Requirements Software architecture must natively support modern enterprise operating system standards: Microsoft Windows 11 Enterprise (including Long-Term Servicing Channel [LTSC] builds). Enterprise Linux Distributions (e.g., Latest version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux [RHEL]). Vendors must state whether their software executes natively on Windows 11, Linux, or maintains a dual-OS cross-platform compiled codebase. 2.3 System Availability and Deterministic State Recovery Deterministic State Recovery: In the event of ungraceful bridge power interruption or system reset, the software must reboot and restore its previous operational state, active route, safety parameters, and sensor assignments without manual database rebuilding. 3. Core Functional Capability Matrix See Attachment. 3.1 Sensor Ingestion & Data Distribution Protocol Support: Native ingestion, parsing, translation, and broadcast of NMEA 0183, NMEA 2000 (IEC 61162-3), NMEA OneNet, and Lightweight Ethernet (LWE)(IEC 61162-450) protocols. Sensor Interfacing: Interfacing with gyrocompasses, Doppler velocity logs (DVL), magnetic compasses, wind sensors, depth sounders, GPS/DGPS/Galileo receivers, Inertial Navigation Systems (INS), and radar targets (ARPA). Integrity & Checksum: Cryptographic and checksum integrity verification for all data streams; automated detection and notification of malformed or invalid sentences. Decoupled Time Distribution: Network time distribution via UDP/TCP; ability to assign an authoritative UTC time source independent of the primary positioning source. 3.2 Data Recording, Playback, and Forensics Comprehensive Logging: Continuous background recording of ownship dynamics, sensor inputs, target tracking data, alert histories, and operator interactions. Storage Flexibility: Ability to write logs and telemetry to internal storage, external mission media (USB/NAS), or enterprise shipboard repositories. Visual Playback: Integrated forensic playback mode providing time-synchronized replay of chart presentation, radar overlay, and sensor states for accident investigation and tactical debrief. 3.3 Chart Management & Next-Gen Hydrographic Standards Legacy Format Support: Seamless handling of S-57 ENC, S-63 encrypted charts, and DNC (Digital Nautical Chart) formats. S-100 Transition Framework: Implementation roadmap and readiness for the IHO S-100 Universal Hydrographic Data Model, specifically: S-101 Electronic Navigational Charts (ENC) S-102 High-Resolution Bathymetric Surfaces S-104 Water Level Information S-111 Surface Currents S-124 Navigational Warnings Manual Corrections: Ability to create, save, import, and visually verify manual notice-to-mariners chart corrections and local marine hazards. 3.4 Operational Display Area (ODA) & Ownship Dynamics Ownship Dynamics: Multi-source position fixing utilizing GNSS (GGA/GNS), INS, Radar Chart Matching, manual visual/radar Lines of Position (LOPs), and Dead Reckoning (DR). Dynamic Calculations: Automated computation of real-time Set and Drift, Course Over Ground (COG), Speed Over Ground (SOG), Speed Through Water (STW), and Rate of Turn (ROT). Tactical Plotting: Rapid generation of Danger Bearings/Ranges, Clearing Lines, Variable Range Markers (VRM), Electronic Bearing Lines (EBL), and instant Man Overboard (MOB) emergency markers. RADAR Overlay: Software must be compatible with Furuno SDK and SSR COMRIC for RADAR overlay capability. 3.5 Human-System Interface (HSI) & Publications Visual Standards: Full conformance with IHO S-52 Presentation Library colors, symbology, and display modes (Day, Dusk, Night). Coordinate Precision: Coordinate calculation and display capabilities resolving latitude and longitude to one thousandth of a second (0.001�). Nautical Nomenclature: Standardization using Pub. 9 (Bowditch) and Chart No. 1 nautical symbology and abbreviations. Electronic Publications: Native viewer for hydrographic reference materials, Standard Bearing Books, and Adobe PDF navigation documentation. 3.6 Cybersecurity, Information Assurance & System Management DoD/DHS Compliance: Architecture capable of being hardened to DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs), meeting NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 security controls, and aligning with Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) parameters. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Distinct cryptographic user/administrator profiles, group policies, and role permissions preserved across software patches and upgrades. Configuration Auditing: Secure text-searchable configuration repositories, system ev
Who won similar work
7 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Coast Guard), same NAICS 513210.
Single-winner award sizes (7): middle half $43K to $4.8M, median $49K; range $21K to $27.0M.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| LCN SERVICES LLC | 1 | $27.0M | Aug 5, 2025 |
| Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation · $NOC · $39.3B | 1 | $9.5M | Sep 5, 2025 |
| DATA ENTERPRISES OF THE NORTHWEST, INC | 1 | $135K | May 6, 2025 |
| AZUL SYSTEMS, INC. | 1 | $49K | Jun 25, 2026 |
| ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. | 1 | $46K | Jul 18, 2025 |
| DLT SOLUTIONS, LLC | 1 | $40K | Jan 2, 2025 |
| GRAPHISOFT NORTH AMERICA INC | 1 | $21K | May 4, 2026 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.
- $NOC reported $39.3B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 7 past awards, $49K, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.
- Jun 25, 2026AZUL SYSTEMS, INC.$49KPayara Software RenewalNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- May 4, 2026GRAPHISOFT NORTH AMERICA INC$21KNotice of Intent - ArchiPLUS Software RenewalNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Sep 5, 2025Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation$9.5MVega Electronic Navigation Software Adaptive Maintenance and Support ServicesMateriality: 0.02% of $NOC revenue (Low) SEC
- Aug 5, 2025LCN SERVICES LLC$27.0MActian Ingres DMBS and OpenROAD SoftwareNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Jul 18, 2025ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.$46KPayara Enterprise Software RenewalsNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- May 6, 2025DATA ENTERPRISES OF THE NORTHWEST, INC$135KATICTS SoftwareNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Jan 2, 2025DLT SOLUTIONS, LLC$40KAdept Desktop Concurrent User License - Maintenance RenewalNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
Materiality: one award's value as a share of the winner's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings (or its last fiscal year, as noted when you point at it). Low under 1%, Medium 1 to 5%, High 5% or more. Many awards are paid over several years, so this overstates a single year's share.
Competitive landscape
For the 7 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 0 of these past winners lobbied U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) since 2024 (0 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) job
- $389K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Homeland Security, House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 433 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 1 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 1 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.