Combined Synopsis/SolicitationPosted Sep 15, 2025·Responses due Sep 22, 2025

Local and Long Distance Telecommunication Services

Air Force and Space Force · FA6712 911 AW LGC

Stage
Open solicitation
NAICS
517111
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
FA671225Q0010
Set-aside
Small Business Set Aside - Total
PSC
DD01
Place
Coraopolis, PA, USA
Contact
Ryan Scott (ryan.scott.34@us.af.mil)
Loading your pipeline and notes…
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation FA671225Q0010 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
None posted
Solicitation
  • Sep 4, 2025
    Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
    Open
  • Sep 8, 2025
    Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
    Open
  • Sep 8, 2025
    Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
    Open
  • Sep 9, 2025
    Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
    Open
  • Sep 10, 2025
    Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
    Open
  • Sep 11, 2025
    Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
    Open
  • Sep 15, 2025 · this notice
    Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
  • Sep 15, 2025
    Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
    Open
Award
  • Oct 1, 2025
    Award Notice
    Elite Veteran Solutions, LLC · $54K
    Open

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Decide bid or no bid before the response deadline.
  • Look at the past winners for likely competitors and teaming partners.
  • Follow the opportunity to hear about amendments and the award.

What the notice says

Amendment #6 - Follow up questions for clarification Q13. The RFQ states the goal is to transition from TDM to IP-based telephony, but Appendix 1 requires PRI circuits. Since PRI is a legacy technology and not typically used with modern IP systems, could you clarify: A13- Are PRI trunks required only to support the legacy system during transition? Yes, PRI trunks are required to support the legacy system during transition. A13- Or would SIP trunks be acceptable as part of the IP-based solution? Also yes, if the PRI trunks can work with the modern IP system then that would be acceptable. ------… (show all)

--------------------------------------------------------------------- Amendment #5 - Final follow up questions submitted for clarification. Q11 follow-up - If we feel we can establish service in under 180 days, will the Government accept delivery sooner than 3/29/26? A11 follow-up - Absolutely, the government will accept delivery sooner. Q12 follow-up - In accordance with industry standards, we have diversity within our cloud SIP product. To clarify our original question- would the customer like more than one physical transport circuit to their location, and would those two circuits need to be physically diverse with regards to their route taken and entrance into the building? Essentially- do you require a primary and a backup circuit in case the first one goes down? A12 follow-up - Yes, more than one physical transport circuit is needed and they need to be physically diverse. We require a primary and a backup circuit. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Amendment #4 - Additional question in regards to the solicitation. Q12. The SAM posting Technical/Installation and Cutover Approach requires offerors to address link diversity. PWS Section 3.8 provides a description of what diversity is but there are no details within the PWS regarding a diversity requirement for this contract. Is there a diversity requirement? If so, what level/type of diversity does the Government require? A12. �Currently, we have two TDM circuits that provide Local/long distance service. The PRI's connect to two different voice gateways. If the plan is to connect to ethernet we could reconfigure one of the Cisco 4451 gateways to support a couple ethernet connections�. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Amendment #3 - Due to the difficulty in opening attachments causing the delay in receiving questions from vendors, the Submission of Offers is extended to 22 Sept 2025 at 3:00 pm. Additionally, the Submission of Offers only requires three parts - Administrative, Technical and Price. Past Performance is NOT required. Only the Technical and Price shall be evaluated for decision of award. Questions Submitted Q1. We request an extension to the quote due date by two weeks from the release of questions & answers to provide sufficient time for offerors to provide a complete, compelling, and compliant offer. A1. Extention will be given till 22 Sept 2025 at 3:00pm to allow for evaluation and award before the end of the fiscal year. Q2. In addition to an extension to allow time to respond to Q&A, we request additional time to respond to the solicitation due to short timeline and offerors' inability to access the solicitation documents prior to 09/08/2025. A2. Unfortunately due to the time constraint of the end of the fiscal year, any further extention could prevent evaluation and award prior to 30 Sept 2025. Extention will be given till 22 Sept 2025 at 3:00pm. Q3. Is there an incumbent contractor, and if so, who? A3. AT&T currently provides the service. Q4. Is there any historical usage for this account in terms of total LTS minutes/month? A4. None Q5. How many concurrent call paths are required? A5. This is unknown at this time. Q6. What is the average number of monthly long-distance minutes? A6. This is unknown at this time. Q7. Is international long-distance calling authorized? If so, to what countries and what is the average number of international monthly long-distance minutes? A7. This is unknown at this time. We have to have capabilities to call all countries, but the minutes are determined by mission which is unknown. Q8. Does the Government's PBX send out one static number for CallerID on 911 calls, or is it the Government's intention to send a unique DID depending on the device that the 911 call was placed from? A8. We have our own internal 911, then our Security Forces will call the civilian 911 when needed. We don't have a preference on what number is displayed. Q9. Appendix 1 PWS shows 2 existing PRIs, however Objective 1.2 is only asking for 24 concurrent calls. Please confirm that 24 concurrent calls is what the contractor is to provide. A9. Confirmed, 24 concurrent calls is needed. Q10. The SAM posting states "The response shall consist of four parts: Administrative, Technical, Price, and Past Performance." There are no instructions for Past Performance submissions. Please confirm that offerors are not required to submit Past Performance information. A10. Changes have been made with this amendment, the only parts required on the offer will be Technical and Price. Past Performance and Administrative are not required. Q11. While the SAM posting states that the projected Start of Work is 30 September 30, 2025, Section 3.1.1 states that "Installation, circuit assignments, all possible/applicable testing, records� management, cut over and Government acceptance shall be completed NLT one hundred and eighty (180) days after contract award for Pittsburgh ARS, PA." For proposal purposes, should we use the PWS statement as the guide for the Installation and Cutover Plans? A11. Yes, the anticipated start date for the contract is 30 Sept. Plans should start at 30 Sept and work out to the 180 day mark stated in the PWS, which should be March 29, 2026. __________________________________________________________________________ Amendment#2 - There was an issue with opening the original "Attachment 2 - Price Schedule" ; new excel file has been added __________________________________________________________________________ Amendment#1 - There was an issue with opening the original PWS (pdf); a new pdf attachment has been added __________________________________________________________________________ This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; Offers are being requested and a written solicitation (paper copy) will not be issued. Further, Offerors are responsible for monitoring this site for the release of amendments (if any) or other information pertaining to this solicitation. Solicitation FA671225Q0010 is issued as a request for quote (RFQ). This solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses for commercial items are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2025-05, Electronic Code of Federal Regulation (eCFR) https://gov.ecfr.io/cgi-bin/ECFRl, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement Publication Notice (DPN) 20250825 and Department of the Air Force Federal Acquisition Circular (DAFAC) 20241016. It is the Offeror�s responsibility to be familiar with applicable provisions and clauses. See https://gov.ecfr.io and https://www.acquisition.gov for the full text of all provisions and clauses incorporated by reference herein. Class deviations can be found at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/class_deviations.html This procurement is being issued as a 100% Total Small Business Set Aside, under NAICS code 517111, Wired Telecommunications Carriers, and a small business size standard of 1,500 employees. The Contractor shall provide all labor, tools, facilities, materials, and services needed to perform and provide loc

Who won similar work

6 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Air Force and Space Force), same product/service code (PSC) DD01.

Single-winner award sizes (6): middle half $575K to $8.4M, median $1.7M; range $330K to $5.6B.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. · $GD · $42.3B1$5.6BNov 12, 2024
JBW FEDITC JV LLC1$10.5MSep 12, 2025
BRIDGES SYSTEM INTEGRATION LLC1$2.2MAug 22, 2025
CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY CORP1$1.1MApr 10, 2025
KRIAANET INC1$406KJul 15, 2025
FTC DIVERSIFIED SERVICES, LLC1$330KApr 16, 2025

Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.

Investor context
  • $GD reported $42.3B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 6 past awards, $1.7M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K

One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.

Latest awards

Materiality: one award's value as a share of the winner's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings (or its last fiscal year, as noted when you point at it). Low under 1%, Medium 1 to 5%, High 5% or more. Many awards are paid over several years, so this overstates a single year's share.

Competitive landscape

For the 6 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 1 of these past winners lobbied Air Force, Dept of since 2024 (10 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Air Force, Dept of job
  • $399K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 8 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 1 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 4 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.