DRAFT RFP - Landing Gear Collaborative Supply Chain Integration II
DLA Aviation · DLA AVIATION AT OGDEN, UT
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation SPRHA1-26-R-1003 in this department, oldest first.
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
UPDATE: Revised version to change Response Date to 24 July 2026. This posting is to share information from a question asked by an interested party along with the Government response: Contractor Comments/Recommendations Upon reviewing the draft solicitation again, it was realized clause C09 was added with a cap of 50%. The Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) Producer Price Index for Industries (PPI) PCU33641333641372 for Other Aircraft Parts and Equipment Manufacturing: Aircraft Landing Gear for Civilian and Military Aircraft is a real, reasonable, quantitative reflection of current and past m… (show all)
arket conditions. The PPI is derived from consolidating hundreds of thousands of economic data time series from scores of national, international, public, and private sources. Placing a ceiling cap on a publicly maintained PPI based on real economic data would render the price paid by the government unreasonable and unfair. Accordingly, it is recommended that clause C09 and H-001 of the LGCSCI II solicitation be amended as follows: Clause C09: Remove section (d) of contract clause C09 in its entirety (including subsections (d)(1) and (d)(2)). Clause H001: Remove section 2(c) in its entirety. Remove the last two and a half sentences from 2(d) where it currently states �� , but the payment is capped. The 50% cap on this H-clause adjustment is $515 (50% of the $1,030 escalated forging price). Therefore, the Government's maximum payment would be $515.� GOVERNMENT RESPONSE Clause C09: The intended PPI index for the CSCI2 effort is PCU3364�3364-- as shown in (b)(1) of the C09 clause in the most recent draft RFP document. Per the attached language at (d), the upward ceiling does not apply to this index. As a result, the language regarding a cap does not apply in (d), (d)(1), or (d)(2). An error was made on the most recent draft by including a % cap for an index below the six-digit level. The language is slightly counterintuitive as it relates to the index numbering, but PCU3364�3364�is considered �above the six-digit level.� NOTE: The �Instructions� tab on the TEP Worksheet will be updated to reflect PCU3364�3364�for the final RFP. Clause H-001: The government believes the clause as written to supplement the C09 is adequate to account for most forging price fluctuations that may be encountered. The forging price that bidders will provide with their proposals for each unit requiring a forging will be escalated each year in accordance with the C09 clause. That escalated forging price (in the year delivery order was issued) will be used as the baseline for any forging cost price adjustments. As such, the forging baseline will theoretically increase with the PCU3364�3364�index over time and provide an initial degree of protection against broad market inflation. With a layer of escalation already applied to the forging price, the clause can then adjust to account for any additional unforeseen spikes in forging costs. The 50% cap identified within the H-001 clause is designed to create a shared-risk environment. The cap allows the government to maintain some level of budget predictability while still offering substantial financial relief for extraordinary cost increases provided the conditions are met in section 3 of the clause.
Who won similar work
7 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same office (DLA AVIATION AT OGDEN, UT), same product/service code (PSC) 1620 and NAICS 336413.
Single-winner award sizes (7): middle half $930K to $2.0M, median $1.4M; range $548K to $3.8M.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| EATON AEROSPACE LLC · $ETN · $23.2B | 3 | $2.4M | Jul 20, 2026 |
| SARGENT AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, LLC | 2 | $3.8M | Sep 24, 2025 |
| TRANSAERO, INC. | 1 | $3.8M | Jun 4, 2026 |
| THOMAS INSTRUMENT, INCORPORATED | 1 | $1.7M | Sep 21, 2026 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.
- $ETN reported $23.2B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 7 past awards, $1.4M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.
- Sep 21, 2026THOMAS INSTRUMENT, INCORPORATED$1.7MDRAG LINK, LANDING (26-R-0823)No listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Jul 20, 2026EATON AEROSPACE LLC$1.0MSTEERING UNIT, AIRCRAFT (26-R-0546)Materiality: <0.01% of $ETN revenue (Low) SEC
- Jun 4, 2026TRANSAERO, INC.$3.8M1620-01-139-6672 (25-R-0244)No listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Nov 13, 2025EATON AEROSPACE LLC$548KSTEERING UNIT,AIRCRMateriality: <0.01% of $ETN revenue (Low) SEC
- Sep 24, 2025SARGENT AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, LLC$2.3MGEARBOX ASSEMBLY, ACNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Sep 2, 2025EATON AEROSPACE LLC$820KSTEERING UNIT, AIRCRMateriality: <0.01% of $ETN revenue (Low) SEC
- Aug 26, 2025SARGENT AEROSPACE & DEFENSE, LLC$1.4MTrunnion Strut, Landing GearNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
Materiality: one award's value as a share of the winner's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings (or its last fiscal year, as noted when you point at it). Low under 1%, Medium 1 to 5%, High 5% or more. Many awards are paid over several years, so this overstates a single year's share.
Competitive landscape
For the 4 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 0 of these past winners lobbied Defense Logistics Agency since 2024 (0 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Defense Logistics Agency job
- No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 1 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.