Award NoticePosted Jun 7, 2026

C1DA--504-26-101 Construct Police Department Holding Cell and Armory

Veterans Affairs · 257-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 17 (36C257)

Stage
Awarded
NAICS
541310
Value
$37K
Solicitation
36C25726AP1172
Set-aside
Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Set-Aside (FAR 19.14)
PSC
C1DA
Place
Not stated
Contact
Horacio Fernandez (horacio.fernandez@va.gov)
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation 36C25726AP1172 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
None posted
Solicitation
None posted
Award
  • Jun 7, 2026 · this notice
    Award Notice
    ELK CONSORTIUM LLC · $37K

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Note the winner and the end of the period of performance for the recompete.
  • Follow the agency to see the next notice for this work.

What the notice says

Purpose The purpose of this Memorandum for Record (MFR) is to document that, for this procurement action, a formal solicitation, site visit, solicitation amendments, or an RFI period are not required because the Government is utilizing the VISN wide Architect/Engineer (A/E) Short Selection Database, which was previously competed and established for use under the Brooks Act and RFO Part 13 streamlined procedures. The Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) Part 13.101(b) permits direct award from quotes and authorizes the use of innovative, streamlined procedures that minimize administrative burden wh… (show all)

en the Government has an existing qualified pool of A/E firms and no further competition is required. This MFR is included in the official contract file to document the decision to use the Short Selection Database and the resulting selection of the highest qualified firm for fee proposal request. Background The VISN 17 A/E Short Selection Database consists of thirty five (35) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) A/E firms, previously evaluated and shortlisted to support VISN 17 engineering requirements. This database was created specifically to streamline Architect/Engineer acquisitions and reduce procurement lead times while remaining fully compliant with the Brooks Act. For this requirement, an A/E Evaluation Board memorandum dated 17 November 2025 documented the review and ranking of all firms in accordance with Brooks Act criteria (FAR 36.602 1). The Board determined that Elk Consortium, LLC was the most highly qualified A/E firm among the Short Selection Database firms and recommended the Government request a fee proposal from this firm. Because the Short Selection Database represents a previously established and qualified pool, additional competition is neither required nor appropriate. Authority: RFO Part 13.101(b) and Brooks Act Procedures RFO Part 13.101(b) authorizes the Government to: Use streamlined, innovative procedures Minimize administrative burden Issue awards directly from quotes Forego unnecessary solicitation activity for actions under simplified acquisition thresholds Under the Brooks Act, the Government must request a fee proposal from the most highly qualified A/E firm. Since qualification based selection has already occurred via the Short Selection Database, no new competition, synopsis, or solicitation is required. These procedures remain fully aligned with long standing SAP principles, including: No requirement for competitive range determinations No requirement for formal solicitation packages No requirement for RFIs, Q&A periods, or formal debriefings Reduced protest risk due to compliance with qualification based selection Emphasis on efficiency, best value, and Government interest Determination: Solicitation and Associated Procedures Not Required Based on the existence and applicability of the Short Selection Database: a. No Solicitation (RFQ) Needed A formal solicitation is not required because the Short Selection Database already provides a fully evaluated pool of qualified A/E firms. The highest qualified firm, Elk Consortium, was identified by the Evaluation Board. Therefore, the Government is authorized to directly request a fee proposal. b. No Site Visit Required A site visit is optional under RFO Part 13. Given the established qualification based process and the nature of the requirement, a site visit is not required prior to requesting a fee proposal. c. No Amendments Required Because no solicitation is issued, amendments are not applicable. d. No RFI or Q&A Period Required All required evaluations were completed as part of the pre existing Short Selection Database process. RFIs or Q&A are not required. e. No Posting or Public Notification Required Under RFO Part 13 and the Brooks Act qualification based selection process, public posting is not required when requesting a fee proposal from the most highly qualified A/E firm. Basis for This Determination This determination is based on: The VISN 17 Short Selection Database containing 35 previously vetted A/E firms The A/E Evaluation Board memorandum identifying Elk Consortium as the most highly qualified firm Brooks Act requirements to select the highest qualified firm without price competition RFO 13.101(b) authority allowing streamlined acquisition and direct requests for quotes/fee proposals The established purpose of the Short Selection Database to reduce procurement lead times Given these factors, additional competition or formal solicitation procedures would provide no benefit and are not required. Conclusion Use of the VISN 17 A/E Short Selection Database satisfies all requirements for qualification based selection. Accordingly, the Government is authorized to: Proceed without issuing a solicitation Forego site visits, amendments, RFIs, and public posting Request a fee proposal directly from the most highly qualified firm, Elk Consortium Use streamlined procedures consistent with RFO Part 13 and the Brooks Act These actions are appropriate, justified, and in the best interest of the Government. Contracting Officer Certification I certify that this MFR accurately reflects the facts and authorities supporting the decision that no solicitation, competition, site visit, amendments, or RFI period are required for this procurement, based on the use of the VISN 17 Short Selection Database and RFO Part 13 authorities.

Who won similar work

6 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same office (257-NETWORK CONTRACT OFFICE 17 (36C257)), same product/service code (PSC) C1DA and NAICS 541310.

Single-winner award sizes (6): middle half $259K to $343K, median $318K; range $87K to $352K.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
ENAPAY, LLC2$636KMar 3, 2026
COX DESIGN ASSOCIATES INC2$437KJul 15, 2026
VALHALLA ENGINEERING GROUP, LLC1$352KJun 4, 2026
OBRIEN ENGINEERING INC1$240KApr 17, 2026

Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 4 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 0 of these past winners lobbied Veterans Affairs, Dept of (VA) since 2024 (0 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Veterans Affairs, Dept of (VA) job
  • No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 25 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 0 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.