58--MECHANICAL SUB ASSE, IN REPAIR/MODIFICATION OF
NAVSUP (Naval Supply Systems Command) · NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT MECH
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation N0010425RXB33 in this department, oldest first.
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Decide bid or no bid before the response deadline.
- Look at the past winners for likely competitors and teaming partners.
- Follow the opportunity to hear about amendments and the award.
What the notice says
ITEM UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AND VALUATION (JAN 2023)|19|||||||||||||||||||| INSPECTION OF SUPPLIES--FIXED-PRICE (AUG 1996)|2||| LIQUIDATED DAMAGES--SUPPLIES, SERVICES, OR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (SEP 2000)|1|TBD| STOP-WORK ORDER (AUG 1989)|1|| WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (JAN 2023)|16|Invoice and Receiving Report (combo)|N/A|TBD|N00104|TBD|TBD|TBD|Enter Vendor DODAAC|||TBD|||||| NAVY USE OF ABILITYONE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR - RELEASE OF OFFEROR INFORMATION (3-18))|1|WSS Mechanicsburg| CONTRACT DEFINITIZATION (MAY 2023)|5|firm-fixed price|fixed-price|TBD|firm-fixed price|TBD| EQUAL OPPO… (show all)
RTUNITY (SEP 2016)|2||| LIMITATION OF GOVERNMENT LIABILITY (APR 1984)|2|TBD|TBD| SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (DOD CONTRACTS)- BASIC (DEC 2019)|2||| INTEGRITY OF UNIT PRICES (NOV 2021)|1|| SUBCONTRACTS (JUN 2020)|2||| EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR VETERANS (JUN 2020)|4||||| SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (JAN 2025)|4||||| SAFEGUARDING SENSITIVE CONVENTIONAL ARMS, AMMUNITION, AND EXPLOSIVES (NOV 2023))|9|||||||||| EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES (JUN 2020)|2||| TRANSPORTATION OF SUPPLIES BY SEA (OCT 2024)|2||| CONTRACTOR PURCHASING SYSTEM ADMINISTRATION-BASIC (JAN 2025)|1|| APPROVAL OF CONTRACT (DEC 1989)|1|| ALTERATION IN CONTRACT (APR 1984)|3|||| AUTHORIZED DEVIATIONS IN CLAUSES (NOV 2020)|2||| LIMITATIONS ON PASS-THROUGH CHARGES (JUN 2020)|1|| REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING DATA AND DATA OTHER THAN CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING DATA-MODIFICATIONS (NOV 2021))|7|||||||| LIST OF AWARD ATTACHMENTS|5|||||| ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (OCT 2024)|13|x|||x|||||||||| BUY AMERICAN-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024)|1|| ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (JAN 2025)|13|325998|650 employees|x|x|x||||||||| REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING DATA AND DATA OTHER THAN CERTIFIED COST OR PRICING DATA (NOV 2021))|7|||||||| TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)|1|Firm-Fixed Price| NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PERPARDENESS, AND ENRGY PROGAM USE (APRIL 2008))|2||x| Accelerated and early delivery is requested due to CASREP urgency. This is a solicitation for REPAIR/UPGRADE of 10 units and REPAIR for the other 1 unit. A. Repair AND Upgrade at QTY 10: FROM: -2 NIIN 016864868 (Port) (P/N 7636336-2). TO: -3 NIIN 016892499 (Port), (P/N 7636336-3. B. Repair at QTY 1: -3 NIIN 016892499 (Port) (P/N 7636336-3). Quantity 10 + Quantity 1 = Total Quantity 11. Electronic submission of any quotes, representations, and any necessary certifications shall be accomplished via an email directed torandy.e.stoker.civ@us.navy.mil C. General Requirements: MIL-STD Packaging, Government Source Inspection, FOBSource, CAV Reporting. D. This RFQ is for REPAIR and REPAIR/UPGRADE. The resultant award of this solicitation will beissued bilaterally, requiring the contractor's written acceptance prior toexecution. Verify nomenclature, part number, and NSN prior to responding. E. Only a Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) or Not-To-Exceed (NTE) pricefor the REPAIR and REPAIR/UPGRADE of the subject item(s) will be accepted. Quotes limited to test and evaluation (T&E) will NOT be accepted. The quoted price MUST be for the REPAIR AND REPAIR/UPGRADE of the item(s). F. Must adhere to IUID requirements of DFARS 252.211-7003 G. The ultimate awardee of the proposed contract action must be an authorizedrepair source. Award of the proposed contract action will not be delayed whilean unauthorized source seeks to obtain authorization. H. The Government is requesting a Repair Turnaround Time (RTAT) of: 92 daysafter receipt of carcasses. Repair Turnaround Time (RTAT) definition: The resultant contractual delivery requirement is measured from asset Return to the date of asset acceptance under the terms of the contract. For purposes of this section, Return is defined asphysical receipt of the F-condition asset at the contractor's facility as reflected in the Action Date entry in the Commercial Asset Visibility (CAV)system. In accordance with the CAV Statement of Work, the contractor isrequired to accurately report all transactions by the end of the f fifth regularbusiness day after receipt and the Action Date entered in CAV must be dated to reflect the actual date of physical receipt. The Contractor must obtain final inspection and acceptance by the Government for all assets within the RTATs established in this contract. Please note freight is handled by Navy CAV or Proxy CAV as stated inNAVSUPWSSFA24 or NAVSUPWSSFA25. Throughput Constraint: Contractor must provide a throughput Constraint for each NSN(s). Total assets to be repaired monthly after initial delivery commences:_____/month (contractor is to fill in #). A throughput of "0" (zero) per month reflects no throughput constraint. Induction Expiration Date: 365 days after contract award date. Any assetreceived after this date in days is not authorized for repair withoutbi-lateral agreement between the Contractor and NAVSUP WSS Contracting Officer. I. IMPORTANT NOTE: Reconciliation Price Reduction: Any asset(s) for which the contractor does not meet the required RTAT will incur a price reduction per unit/per month the contractor is late. However,any delay determined to be excusable (e.g. Government Delay) will not result in a price reduction. If the contractor does not meet the required RTAT due to inexcusable contractor delay, the Contracting Officer will implement theaforementioned price reduction via a "Reconciliation Modification" at the endof the contract performance. Price reductions made pursuant to this sectionshall not limit other remedies available to the Government for failure to meetrequired RTATs, including but not limited to the Government's right toterminate for default. In reference to the above important note, the contractor provides the following price reduction amount per unit/per month the contractor does not meet the RTAT: $___________, up to a maximum of: $__________. (vendor is to fill in amount) J. Your quote MUST include the following information for justification purposes: - Repair unit price ________________ - Repair and Upgrade unit price_________ - Total price________________ - Repair Turnaround Time (RTAT) _____________ days NOTE: If you are not quoting the Government's Requested Repair Turnaround Time(RTAT) or sooner, you must provide your company's capacity constraints below: ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________ - Indicate Price Type: Firm-Fixed-Price _____ Not-to-Exceed (Ceiling Price) _____ - New unit price_________________ - New unit delivery lead time____________ days - T&E fee/price (if asset is determined BR/BER): If an item is determined BR,and the contractor provides documentation that costs were incurred duringevaluation and determination of BR/BER, the contracting officer will negotiate a reduced contract price, not-to exceed (NTE) $___________associated with the repair effort to reflect the BR status of the equipment. - The T&E fee (if asset is determined BR/BER) was determined based on ____________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________ - Award to CAGE:________ - Inspection & Acceptance CAGE, if not the same as Award to CAGE: _________ - Facility/Subcontractor CAGE (where the asset should be shipped to), if notsame as Award to CAGE. __________ - Facility/Subcontractor or Packaging Facility CAGE (where the asset will beshipped from), if not the same as Award to CAGE. ________ - Basis of quoted pricing: ; Estimated costs____ ; Historical repair pricing___ ;Other ______________________________________________ - Cost breakdown requested, including profit rate (if feasible). - Quote expiration date _______________________ (MIN of 90 Days is requested). - Delivery Vehicle (i
Who won similar work
5 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same office (NAVSUP WEAPON SYSTEMS SUPPORT MECH), same product/service code (PSC) 5865.
Single-winner award sizes (5): middle half $1.5M to $14.1M, median $3.2M; range $776K to $200.0M.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAYTHEON COMPANY · $RTX · $93.5B | 2 | $201.5M | Aug 8, 2026 |
| ARMTEC COUNTERMEASURES CO | 1 | $14.1M | Jul 24, 2025 |
| CAES SYSTEMS LLC · $HON · $38.1B | 1 | $3.2M | Aug 27, 2026 |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation · $LMT · $77.0B | 1 | $776K | Apr 30, 2025 |
Value counts new single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling (same contract, or the same office, day and amount); that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Contract modifications are not new awards and are not added in either. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings.
- $RTX reported $93.5B revenue (12 months to Jun 30, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 5 past awards, $3.2M, is under 0.1% of that. SEC filing
- $HON reported $38.1B revenue (12 months to Jun 30, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 5 past awards, $3.2M, is under 0.1% of that. SEC filing
- $LMT reported $77.0B revenue (12 months to Jun 28, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 5 past awards, $3.2M, is under 0.1% of that. SEC filing
One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.
- Aug 27, 2026CAES SYSTEMS LLC$3.2M58--MODULE, YIG/SWMateriality: <0.01% of $HON revenue (Low) SEC
- Aug 8, 2026RAYTHEON COMPANY$1.5M58--MECH SUB-ASSY STBD, IN REPAIR/MODIFICATION OFMateriality: <0.01% of $RTX revenue (Low) SEC
- Oct 28, 2025RAYTHEON COMPANY$200.0M5865 - MECH SUB-ASSY STBD, NSN: 5865 016864940, P/N: 7636337-3Materiality: 0.21% of $RTX revenue (Low) SEC
- Jul 24, 2025ARMTEC COUNTERMEASURES CO$14.1M5865 - RR-129 A/AL Chaff Cartridges RR-144 A/AL Chaff CartridgesNo listed company matched (Materiality N/A)
- Apr 30, 2025Lockheed Martin Corporation$776K58--COMPARATOR MODULE,S, IN REPAIR/MODIFICATION OFMateriality: <0.01% of $LMT revenue (Low) SEC
Materiality: one award's value as a share of the winner's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings (or its last fiscal year, as noted when you point at it). Low under 1%, Medium 1 to 5%, High 5% or more. Many awards are paid over several years, so this overstates a single year's share.
Competitive landscape
For the 4 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 2 of these past winners lobbied Navy, Dept of or U.S. Marines since 2024 (20 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Navy, Dept of or U.S. Marines job
- $1.0M from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 8 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 3 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 7 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name, including the subsidiaries a company lists in its SEC filings. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.