Enterprise RFID Technology, Installation, and Azure WIMS Integration
Commerce (all) · DEPT OF COMMERCE CENSUS
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation CENS-REQ-27-WIMS in this department, oldest first.
- Oct 14, 2026 · this noticeSources Sought
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
United States Census Bureau (USCB) Enterprise RFID Technology, Installation, and Azure WIMS Integration REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) This RFI is solely for information and planning purposes � it does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP) or a promise to issue an RFP in the future. Further, the USCB is at the early stages of market research and is not, at this time, seeking proposals and will not accept unsolicited proposals. Interested parties are advised that the U.S. Government will not pay for any information or administrative costs incurred in response to this RFI; all costs associa… (show all)
ted with responding to this RFI will be solely at the interested party�s expense. Not responding to this RFI does not preclude participation in any future RFP, if any is issued. 1.0 Purpose The U.S. Census Bureau (USCB) issues this Request for Information (RFI) for market research under Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 10 to understand current business practices and identify industry capabilities for furnishing, installing, configuring, testing, and integrating radio frequency identification (RFID) technology with the USCB�s existing Warehouse Inventory Management System (WIMS). The USCB seeks industry input on these types of services and expertise in achieving the desired objectives in accordance with federal requirements. To date, the USCB has already developed a scalable WIMS platform using Microsoft technologies in its Microsoft Azure environment. This RFI does not seek a replacement warehouse management platform. The USCB�s primary interest is to acquire industry recommendations on RFID equipment and supporting software, facility deployment and integration services, and secure delivery of RFID event data into the existing WIMS environment. The USCB believes industry has the best knowledge of current offerings and how to plan for, acquire, and integrate evolving technology trends. Vendors are encouraged to provide recommendations and describe innovative, commercially available, and proven approaches that address the objectives detailed within this RFI without being constrained by a prescriptive equipment design or configuration. 2.0 Background and Operational Environment The USCB manages survey forms, printing and mailing materials, shipping supplies, and other inventory supporting demographic, economic, and decennial programs, including preparations for 2030 Census tests. Inventory is received, stored, moved, issued, transferred, and shipped through multiple facilities. Automated identification and transaction capture can reduce manual inventory handling and improve the accuracy and timeliness of enterprise inventory records. Potential locations include National Processing Center operations in Charlestown, Indiana; Census Bureau Headquarters in Suitland, Maryland; a warehouse in Franconia, Virginia; Regional Offices; and other Government-designated facilities. Actual locations, installation scope, sequencing, and site access would be determined by the Government. These locations may have different layouts, physical security restrictions, network conditions, and operating requirements. 3.0 Objectives and Mission-Critical Capability Areas The USCB intends to leverage industry knowledge, feedback, recommendations, and expertise on proven approaches and best practices that achieve the objectives listed below. 3.1 RFID identification and multi-level tracking The USCB is interested in tracking at the item or box, pallet, and rack or storage-location levels. Industry recommendations may include passive or active RFID, hybrid approaches, or complementary identification methods where appropriate. Recommended solutions should support reliable identification and location/movement events during receiving, putaway, internal transfers, picking, shipping, cycle counting, and reconciliation. Input is requested to address read accuracy, interference, duplicate or missed events, and the practical limits of location precision. 3.2 Equipment provision, site assessment, and installation The contemplated effort includes facility assessments; design and equipment selection; provision of tags, readers, antennas, handheld or mobile equipment, portals, and supporting components as appropriate; physical installation and configuration; and operational testing. Respondents shall provide input into the considerations made in regards to site dependencies, secured-space work practices, commissioning, warranties, support, and expansion to additional facilities, as directed. 3.3 Secure integration with existing Microsoft Azure WIMS The RFID solution must exchange usable, timely data with the existing Government WIMS rather than create a competing inventory system of record. Respondents are requested to recommend integration of reader and edge-device feeds with Azure-hosted WIMS through appropriate secure interfaces, APIs, messaging, middleware, or other standards-based methods. Anticipated work may include event filtering, data mapping to Government inventory identifiers and locations, interface development, custom fields or components as needed, error handling, testing, documentation, and knowledge transfer. Specific Azure services and interface specifications will be coordinated with the Government during subsequent planning. 3.4 Security, reliability, and sustainment The USCB seeks recommended approaches and solutions suitable for controlled federal facilities and integration with its existing authorized cloud boundary, subject to applicable security review and approval. Respondents are requested to provide information which describes secure communications, device administration, access control, logging, resilience during network interruptions, patching, lifecycle support, and long-term costs. The USCB seeks recommended approaches which permit Government operation and sustainment without unnecessary vendor lock-in. 4.0 Industry Response and Feedback Questions A. RFID technology and operational performance 1. Describe your recommended technology and architecture for identifying and tracking individual items or boxes, pallets, and racks or storage locations in multiple warehouse facilities. Explain any recommended RFID or hybrid approaches. 2. Identify the major hardware and software components your recommended approach would provide, including tags, fixed or mobile readers, antennas, portals, edge components, and management tools. Distinguish commercial products from custom components. 3. How would your solution capture receiving, putaway, internal movement, picking, shipping, transfers, and cycle-count events, and associate them with the correct inventory identifiers and locations? 4. What read accuracy and location precision can realistically be achieved, and how do you address dense racks, metal, packaging, interference, missed reads, and duplicate events? 5. What mobile, handheld, exception-resolution, and offline or intermittent-connectivity capabilities are available for warehouse operators? B. Facility assessment, installation, and rollout 6. Describe your approach to surveying facilities, developing a site-specific equipment design, and determining reader, antenna, portal, and network placement. 7. Describe your ability to furnish, install, configure, and commission equipment in secured Government spaces at Charlestown, IN; Suitland, MD; Franconia, VA; Regional Offices; and other locations as directed. Identify subcontractor dependencies. 8. What facility, electrical, networking, physical security, access, and Government-furnished resources would typically be needed for installation and operation? 9. Identify a phased pilot-to-enterprise deployment approach, including indicative schedule, testing and acceptance criteria, and the approach for minimizing disruption to ongoing warehouse operations. C. Existing WIMS and Azure integration 10. Describe how RFID data would be securely transmitted, processed, and integrated into an existing Microsoft Azure-hosted WIMS, without
Who won similar work
8 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (Commerce (all)), same product/service code (PSC) DA10.
Single-winner award sizes (8): middle half $119K to $1.9M, median $226K; range $33K to $13.3M.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| SLINGSHOT AEROSPACE INC | 1 | $13.3M | Nov 26, 2024 |
| IP.COM I, LLC | 1 | $5.1M | Feb 18, 2026 |
| FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC. · $FDS · $2.1B | 1 | $879K | Aug 24, 2026 |
| Ansys Government Initiatives, LLC | 1 | $308K | Jul 31, 2025 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA NW 5957 P. O. BOX 1450 Minneapolis MN 55485 USA | 1 | $144K | Sep 24, 2025 |
| KITWARE INC | 1 | $137K | Aug 15, 2025 |
| Synegen, Inc | 1 | $64K | Mar 11, 2025 |
| URNER BARRY PUBLICATIONS, INC. | 1 | $33K | Sep 23, 2025 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.
- $FDS reported $2.1B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 8 past awards, $226K, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.
- Aug 24, 2026FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC.$879KEnterprise Financial and Market Intelligence Platform
- Feb 18, 2026IP.COM I, LLC$5.1MSubscription Service for InnovationQ+ with IP.com
- Sep 24, 2025REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA NW 5957 P. O. BOX 1450 Minneapolis MN 55485 USA$144KD--Satellite Imagery Processing Enhancements
- Sep 23, 2025URNER BARRY PUBLICATIONS, INC.$33KD--Urner Barry (Expana) Online Seafood Market and Onl
- Aug 15, 2025KITWARE INC$137KD--1305M325C0032 Steller Sea Lion AI
- Jul 31, 2025Ansys Government Initiatives, LLC$308KD--Systems Tool Kit (STK) Software Licenses (8/1/2025
- Mar 11, 2025Synegen, Inc$64KLearning Management System for Baldrige Performance Excellence Program (BPEP)
- Nov 26, 2024SLINGSHOT AEROSPACE INC$13.3MPresentation Layer of the Traffic Coordination System for Space (TraCSS)
Competitive landscape
For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 0 of these past winners lobbied Commerce, Dept of (DOC) since 2024 (0 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Commerce, Dept of (DOC) job
- No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 372 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 1 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.