Special NoticePosted Sep 22, 2026·Responses due Oct 1, 2026

Fingerprinting Services

NAVAIR and air warfare centers · NAVAL AIR WARFARE CENTER AIR DIV

Stage
Early notice (sources sought, presolicitation or special notice)
NAICS
561611
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
None
Set-aside
None stated
PSC
R615
Place
USA
Contact
Sheryl Pope (Sheryl.m.pope.civ@us.navy.mil)
Loading your pipeline and notes…
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

This notice has no solicitation number, so earlier and later notices cannot be tied to it.

Early notice
  • Sep 22, 2026 · this notice
    Special Notice
Solicitation
None posted
Award
Not yet. Typical award: Dec 3, 2026 to Jul 4, 2027, middle of the range Feb 22, 2027.
Measured from 3964 past early notices at Dept of the Navy that later posted an award (middle half of cases, counted from Sep 22, 2026).

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
  • Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
  • Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.

What the notice says

Special Notice #1 Industry Questions / Governement Response 1. Are you able to tell me if the government will supply the machines to capture fingerprints or is the vendor required to possess their own machinery? Contractor Owned 2. What is the estimated annual/monthly volume of fingerprint submissions? See Section B 780/annual and Section L 4. What is the place of performance (which NAWCAD site(s))? See Section C 2.0 and Section L, c) 5. Who is the applicant population - employees, interns, contractors, or all three? All three 6. Will the contractor need to provide SWFT/SWFT+ hardware and soft… (show all)

ware, or is equipment government-furnished? Contractor owned hardware; Government owned software 7. Is any specific certification or training required for operators performing the fingerprint capture? SWFT Training and Privacy Act/Personally Identifiable Information Training 8. Is there a required turnaround time from capture to submission? Same day 9. What is the anticipated period of performance start date? 10/8/2026 10. Is this strictly on-site work, or is any portion remote/administrative? On-site and administrative work at contractor locations 11. What are the evaluation factors - price only, or technical/past performance as well? See Section L Price, Technical requirements and Section M, 52.212-2 12. Is a capability statement or proposed personnel resumes required with the quote? See Section L. There are submissions required to demonstrate technical capability as as well asto detail pricing. 13. May an offeror satisfy these technical requirements through an identified subcontractor whose existing nationwide infrastructure and systems will be utilized in performance of the contract? Yes 14. What is your preferred method for bid submission? Email to contract specialist sheryl.m.pope.civ@us.navy.mil and Contracting Officer jennifer.t.hanson2.civ@us.navy.mil 15. I see the published 8-page maximum limit. Does the SF-1449 and signed Attestation form count toward the 8-page limit? The 8 page limit is to demonstrate technical capability and to provide pricing. The SF1449 and attestation do not count towards the page count limit. 16. Do you expect any out-of-country fingerprint processing as part of this contract? No 17. Can you please confirm that there will be no requirement by the vendor to reimburse applicants for fees associated with hard-card processing, including shipping, processing, etc? Can you confirm the vendor will only be required to process digitization fees? Confirm, both 18. Can you please provide an expected distribution of volume by geography? IE, should we expect a high volume in certain areas? Varies, no historical data available

Who won similar work

702 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (NAVAIR and air warfare centers), any industry: a loose match.

Loose match: same agency, any industry. Read the titles before treating these as competitors.

Single-winner award sizes (694): middle half $268K to $21.0M, median $2.5M; range $448 to $22.9B.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
RAYTHEON COMPANY · $RTX · $93.5B45$26.1BOct 16, 2026
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION · $NOC · $42.9B37$2.8BOct 9, 2026
THE BOEING COMPANY · $BA · $94.0B33$8.8BOct 14, 2026
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP · $LMT · $77.0B30$4.2BOct 9, 2026
BELL BOEING JOINT PROJECT OFFICE Amarillo TX 79111 USA24$663.2MOct 19, 2026
SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION · $LMT · $77.0B20$11.3BOct 5, 2026
AAR GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. · $AIR · $3.5B12$1.7BApr 24, 2026
ROCKWELL COLLINS, INC. · $RTX · $93.5B11$417.8MSep 29, 2026
BAE SYSTEMS INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS INTEGRATION INC.11$165.2MOct 6, 2026
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.10$741.8MApr 21, 2026

Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.

Investor context
  • $RTX reported $93.5B revenue (12 months to Jun 30, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 694 past awards, $2.5M, is under 0.1% of that. SEC filing
  • $NOC reported $42.9B revenue (12 months to Jun 30, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 694 past awards, $2.5M, is under 0.1% of that. SEC filing
  • $BA reported $94.0B revenue (12 months to Jun 30, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 694 past awards, $2.5M, is under 0.1% of that. SEC filing
  • $LMT reported $77.0B revenue (12 months to Jun 28, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 694 past awards, $2.5M, is under 0.1% of that. SEC filing
  • $AIR reported $3.5B revenue (12 months to Aug 31, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 694 past awards, $2.5M, is under 0.1% of that. SEC filing

One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.

Latest awards

Materiality: one award's value as a share of the winner's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings (or its last fiscal year, as noted when you point at it). Low under 1%, Medium 1 to 5%, High 5% or more. Many awards are paid over several years, so this overstates a single year's share.

Competitive landscape

For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 3 of these past winners lobbied Navy, Dept of or U.S. Marines since 2024 (39 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Navy, Dept of or U.S. Marines job
  • $1.6M from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 8 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 5 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 6 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.