Combined Synopsis/SolicitationPosted Jul 8, 2025·Original deadline passed (Jul 16). See latest amendment for current deadline.

R--Interpretive Strategic Plan - Brown v. Board of Ed

National Park Service · MWR MIDWEST REGION(60000)

Stage
Open solicitation
NAICS
541720
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
140P6025Q0044
Set-aside
SBA Certified Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) Program Set-Aside (FAR 19.15)
PSC
R499
Place
Topeka, KS, USA
Contact
Bissaillon, James (James_Bissaillon@nps.gov)
Loading your pipeline and notes…
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation 140P6025Q0044 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
None posted
Solicitation
  • Jun 26, 2025
    Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
    Open
  • Jul 8, 2025 · this notice
    Combined Synopsis/Solicitation
Award
  • Aug 11, 2025
    Award Notice
    LEXICON & LINE LLC · $87K
    Open

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Decide bid or no bid before the response deadline.
  • Look at the past winners for likely competitors and teaming partners.
  • Follow the opportunity to hear about amendments and the award.

What the notice says

Interpretive Strategic Plan for Brown v. Board of Education National Historical Park (BRVB) Topeka, KS The purpose of Amendment 0001 is to provide questions and answers. Q1: Are there any known challenges or improvements the agency is hoping to address through this contract? A1: See Scope of Work. Q2: Can you confirm that this solicitation is a Woman-Owned Small Business and not just a Small Business set aside? A2: This is set aside for SBA Certified Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB). Q3: Reference: Pg 18 - (D) Subfactor 4 - Previous Experience: Does the Previous Experience have to be that of … (show all)

the Lead Firm or can the previous experience be that of the Team Members? Is it limited to national parks or can state/city parks count as well? A3: Experience can be that of the team members, just be sure to state that in your response. Experience can be from anywhere - not limited to federal, state, or local government work. Q4: Can the stakeholders present at the Focus Groups be given an honoraria for their participation? If so, is there a minimum/maximum rate requirement? A4: Yes. There are no minimum/maximum rates, although other focus groups have offered from between $25-$200 to participants. NPS cannot provide the honoraria and it is not required to be offered. Q5: Will all focus groups be Kansas or in all five locations? In person or virtual? A5: The focus groups will be at all five locations and can be hosted virtually, but in-person is preferred, as many participants are of an age that struggle with technology. Q6: Will a venue for each of the Focus Groups (for each of the 5 listed park areas/communities) be provided or should meeting venues be included in the budget? A6: NPS/BRVB has cooperative agreements with each of the five sites and can likely provide a venue at each location, however, some sites are rural and a more centrally located/easily accessible venue may be preferred (Charleston, SC instead of Summerton, for example.) Q7: Is there a list and potential contacts of stakeholders for each of the 5 listed parks stated in the SOW? Or will this have to be developed/sourced by the consultant team? A7: There is a pre-existing list of contacts for each location, though we are happy to have more stakeholders involved and would invite the consultants to seek more participants. Q8: Has any engagement occurred with this group thus far? Example being the last Long Range Interpretive plan? What was the contract number and award amount if so? Is there a budget range? A8: Yes. The Foundation Document that is near completion was started last year and included focus groups at each of the five sites. The engagement was spearheaded by the National Park Service's Midwest Regional Office. Q9: Is NPS seeking cost estimation as a part of the plan for any suggested activities by the consultant team? A9: Yes Q10: Will teams need to have a historic preservationist? A10: A historic preservationist is not required, as there are very few objects in the Brown v. Board of Education collection, though it may be of benefit to have an archivist to assess historical documents (though also not required.) Q11: What is the estimated start date for the contract? A11: The anticipated start date is July 25, 2025, with a period of performance of 15 months after contract award. Q12: Are you open to pop up engagement or in person engagement in the park spaces? A12: Yes. Q13: Is there an established group of African American community members to engage or are you open to broadening their stakeholder group? A13: There is an established group, but we are always looking for input from more people who are or who have been impacted by the Brown decisions. Q14: What kind of documentation, if any, is required for the Focus Groups and meetings i.e. video recordings, transcripts, attendance records, etc? A14: None required, though recordkeeping of any kind is a bonus to the park. In particular, recollections of students who attended segregated schools are of significant value to the park. Q15: Can the submission deadline date be revised/pushed back to account for the Q&A responses? A15: The quote due date may be extended based on the needs of the government. Any change to the due date will be announced in an amendment to the solicitation on www.sam.gov. Q16: Is there a budget or a budget range? A16: Government estimates are for internal use only. Reminder that all amendments must be acknowledged by the solicitation close date and time. James Bissaillon Contract Specialist DOI, National Park Service ConOps Central, Nebraska Major Acquisition Buying Office Email: james_bissaillon@nps.gov

Who won similar work

32 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (National Park Service), same product/service code (PSC) R499.

Single-winner award sizes (32): middle half $38K to $228K, median $101K; range $6K to $1.5M.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
CCI CONSTRUCTION AND ENERGY SERVICES, LLC3$753KJun 25, 2026
J FOSTER & ASSOCIATES LLC2$909KSep 12, 2025
PRESERVATION ARTS, LLC2$133KSep 18, 2025
West 4th Strategy, LLC1$1.5MMar 31, 2026
HDR ENGINEERING INC1$635KAug 19, 2026
Cherokee Nation Solutions Link, L.L.C.1$442KMar 31, 2026
DPV TRANSPORTATION, INC1$362KApr 30, 2026
COLOSSAL CONTRACTING LLC1$250KSep 3, 2026
SILHOUETTE FARM & FORESTRY, LLC1$220KAug 19, 2025
BILL'S TAXI SERVICE, INC1$199KJun 5, 2025

Value counts new single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling (same contract, or the same office, day and amount); that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Contract modifications are not new awards and are not added in either. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 0 of these past winners lobbied Natl Park Service (NPS) since 2024 (0 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Natl Park Service (NPS) job
  • No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 15 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.

  • 0 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name, including the subsidiaries a company lists in its SEC filings. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.