Standard Missile 2 (SM-2) Test Equipment (TE) Improvements Sources Sought
NAVSEA, naval shipyards and surface/undersea warfare centers · NAVSEA HQ
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation N00024-23-C-5408 in this department, oldest first.
- Mar 24, 2026 · this noticeSources Sought
- Mar 16, 2026Combined Synopsis/SolicitationOpen
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
THIS IS A SOURCES SOUGHT NOTICE ONLY. THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP). THERE IS NO RFP AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. THIS SOURCES SOUGHT NOTICE IS NOT TO BE CONSTRUED AS A COMMITMENT BY THE GOVERNMENT FOR ANY ACTUAL PROCUREMENT OF MATERIALS OR SERVICES. Introduction/Background: In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 5, the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), on behalf of the Program Executive Officer Integrated Warfare Systems (PEO IWS), is conducting market research to identify potential sources with the requisite capabilities to perform the design, development, manuf… (show all)
acture, and integration of replacement test equipment for the Standard Missile-2 (SM-2) program. SM-2 is the primary extended-range air defense weapon for AEGIS cruisers and destroyers, providing a critical capability for the protection of U.S. and allied forces. The test equipment used for maintaining the SM-2 is obsolete and unsustainable. Critical legacy test stations are experiencing increasing failures, which negatively impacts missile repair throughput and fleet readiness. The Government is seeking information on potential sources for the following efforts: Replacement Test Stations: This effort includes the complete engineering redesign, material procurement, assembly, integration, and delivery of modern, sustainable replacements for the legacy Antenna Test Station (TP-6059) and Seeker Head Test Station (TP-6098). The effort includes the provision of critical spares for the new stations. New Infrared (IR) Test Capability: This effort includes designing, manufacturing, and integrating a replacement for an obsolete IR Target and Radiometer solution used for SM-2 Block IIIB Guidance Section testing. The effort includes the production of a spare unit of this capability. Information Sought: Respondents are requested to provide a capabilities statement that addresses the following areas. This statement should include sufficient detail to allow the Government to make a thorough assessment of the respondent's capabilities. Company Qualifications and Experience: Describe your company's capabilities and direct experience in the design, development, integration, and production of complex test systems of similar size and complexity to those described. Provide details on your experience managing the complete lifecycle of test equipment, including engineering redesign of legacy systems, supply chain management, Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) mitigation, and quality assurance. Describe your company's facilities, equipment, and key personnel. Include information on facility clearances and any relevant quality certifications necessary to manufacture, integrate, and test missile depot-level support equipment for the U.S. Navy. Technical Approach and Capabilities: Provide your notional technical approach to designing, manufacturing, and delivering modern, sustainable replacements for the Antenna and Seeker Test Stations. Outline your technical approach to designing and producing a new IR Target and Radiometer solution and integrating it into existing government test stations. Describe your systems engineering methodology for managing the technical baseline, ensuring the new designs are maintainable, and validating that they meet all functional and performance requirements. Describe your risk management approach for cost, schedule, and technical performance for this type of engineering design and manufacturing effort. Design and Manufacturing Capacity: Detail your company's current and potential maximum capacity for designing, manufacturing, and integrating specialized test equipment. Describe a notional plan and timeline to execute the efforts described, from design finalization through delivery and integration. This should include any anticipated investments in facilities, special tooling, or personnel required. Data Rights: For the technical approaches described, provide details on any expected limitations on the Government�s rights to technical data and computer software. Clearly identify any processes, components, or software that are considered proprietary. Submittal Instructions: Interested parties are requested to submit a capabilities statement in response to this sources sought notice. Responses must be submitted via email to the points of contact listed below no later than 12 April 2026. The subject line should reference "Sources Sought Notice: SM-2 Depot Test Equipment Replacement". Please limit responses to a maximum of 20 pages. Proprietary information must be clearly marked. The cover page shall include: Company Name, Address, Point of Contact (Name, Phone Number, and Email). Company's business size (Small or Large) relative to NAICS Code 336414 (Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing). Small Businesses should indicate the percentage of work that would be self-performed. Points of Contact: Contracting Officer: Roy Yim (roy.h.yim2.civ@us.navy.mil) Contract Specialist: Joseph Strain (joseph.r.strain4.civ@us.navy.mil) Contract Specialist: Ashley Mathew (ashley.mathew2.civ@us.navy.mil) Disclaimer: This notice is for market research and planning purposes only and does not constitute a RFP or obligation on the part of the Government. Responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding contract. The Government will not provide reimbursement for any costs or expenses associated with submitting a response. Respondents will not be notified of the results of this notice. Information obtained from submitted responses may be used to develop a future acquisition strategy.
Who won similar work
3 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same office (NAVSEA HQ), same product/service code (PSC) 1410 and NAICS 336414.
Single-winner award sizes (3): middle half $115.0M to $3.0B, median $160.9M; range $69.1M to $5.9B.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAYTHEON COMPANY · $RTX · $93.5B | 3 | $6.1B | Oct 8, 2026 |
Value counts new single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling (same contract, or the same office, day and amount); that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Contract modifications are not new awards and are not added in either. Notices whose amount is a placeholder such as $999,999,999 are not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings.
- $RTX reported $93.5B revenue (12 months to Jun 30, 2026). The median single-winner award in these 3 past awards, $160.9M, is 0.2% of that. SEC filing
One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.
- Oct 8, 2026RAYTHEON COMPANY$69.1MStandard Missile-2 (SM-2) Test Equipment (TE) and FY26 Material and Inventory (M&I)Materiality: 0.07% of $RTX revenue (Low) SEC
- Oct 6, 2026RAYTHEON COMPANY$160.9MStandard Missile-6 (SM-6) Block IAU Transition to Production (TTP) Award NotificationMateriality: 0.17% of $RTX revenue (Low) SEC
- Oct 6, 2026RAYTHEON COMPANY$5.9BFY26 Standard Missile 6 Production Multi-year ProcurementMateriality: 6.3% of $RTX revenue (High) SEC
Materiality: one award's value as a share of the winner's revenue over the latest 12 months in its SEC filings (or its last fiscal year, as noted when you point at it). Low under 1%, Medium 1 to 5%, High 5% or more. Many awards are paid over several years, so this overstates a single year's share.
Competitive landscape
For the 1 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 0 of these past winners lobbied Navy, Dept of or U.S. Marines since 2024 (0 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Navy, Dept of or U.S. Marines job
- $386K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 1 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 4 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name, including the subsidiaries a company lists in its SEC filings. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.