Magnetic Stanchions at MIA
TSA · MISSION ESSENTIALS
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation 70T05026Q5903N008 in this department, oldest first.
- Sep 14, 2026SolicitationOpen
- Sep 18, 2026 · this noticeSolicitation
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Decide bid or no bid before the response deadline.
- Look at the past winners for likely competitors and teaming partners.
- Follow the opportunity to hear about amendments and the award.
What the notice says
In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 4.1102 quoters are required to be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) at the time an offer or quotation is submitted. (i) This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation. (ii) The solicitation number is 70T05026Q5903N008. The solicitation is issued as a request for quotation (RFQ). (iii) All questions must be submitted via email to Hea… (show all)
ther Lewis at heather.lewis@tsa.dhs.gov no later than Thursday, September 17th, 2025 at 10:00 am. Eastern Time. (iv) All quotes must be submitted to the above email no later than Tuesday, September 22nd at 10:00 pm. Eastern Time. (v) The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2025-04. (vi) This acquisition is issued with a total small business set aside. The associated NAICS code is 332510 - Hardware Manufacturing. (vii) List of line item numbers and items, quantities, and units of measure: See Attachment. 1) Description of requirements for the items to be acquired: 220 � Magnetic Stanchions delivered to Miami International Airport (MIA) (viii) Delivery, acceptance, and FOB point are at the below address. ATTN: Giovanni Colon MIA Storage Facility 1336 NW 78th Ave, Doral, FL 33126 (ix) The provision at 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial applies to this acquisition. There are no addenda to the provision. (x) The provision at 52.212-2, Evaluation -- Commercial Items does not apply to the solicitation. The evaluation procedures to be used are as follows: Award will be made using the lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) selection process. Award may be made on initial quotations. Therefore, each initial quote should contain the quoter's best terms from a technical, all submission requirements and price standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to contact quoters if it is later determined by the contracting officer to be necessary or in the government's best interests. The LPTA process will proceed as follows: 1) Quotes may be removed from consideration for, but not limited to, the following reasons: � Quotes that are not received timely � Quotes that fail to follow the instructions in FAR Provision 52.212-1 � Quotes that fail to submit ALL required documentation/provisions � Quotes that have language inconsistent with the terms and conditions set forth in the solicitation 2) Quotes will be ordered by price from lowest to highest. 3) The Government will then review Factor 1 of the lowest priced quote. If the review finds that Factor 1 of the lowest priced quote is acceptable, the Government will then evaluate Factor 2 of the lowest priced quote. If the review finds that Factor 2 of the lowest priced quote is acceptable, that quote represents the best value to the Government and the technical evaluation process stops at this point. Contingent upon a subsequent determination of price reasonableness (Factor 3) and of contractor responsibility by the Contracting Officer, an award will be made to that quoter without further consideration of any other quoters. If the lowest quote is determined not to be acceptable for any reason, then the next lowest priced quote will receive an evaluation as described above. The process will continue in order by price until a quote from a responsible contractor is determined to be acceptable and priced fairly and reasonably. 4) USING THIS PROCEDURE, THE GOVERNMENT MAY NOT EVALUATE ALL QUOTES. (e) Each Factor will be evaluated as follows: Factor 1. Technical Acceptability Technical Acceptability will be rated on an "acceptable" or "unacceptable" basis as follows: Acceptable - Quoter completes the Attachment (1) Technical Compliance Table indicating the item meets the salient characteristics specified and all SOW 2.2 requirements and provides sufficient supporting documentation to show acceptability to the salient characteristics; and submits a completed Attachment (2) Reps and Certs document or indicates compliance with the Reps and Certs statement provided in the table of Attachment (1). Unacceptable - Quoter did not complete the Attachment (1) Technical Compliance Table indicating the item meets the salient characteristics specified and SOW 2.2 requirements and/or did not provide sufficient supporting documentation to show acceptability to the salient characteristics; and/or did not submit a completed Attachment (2) Reps and Certs document or did not indicate compliance with the Reps and Certs statement provided in the table of Attachment (1). Factor 2. Price The Quoter shall provide a total price for the sample traps that meets all the requirements in SOW 2.2. Submission Requirements: All requirements must be received in order to be considered technically acceptable. -Completed Pricing schedule: Refer to the attached RFQ Fillable Requirement for structure of pricing schedule -Completed Attachment 1 � Technical Compliance Table -Completed Attachment 2 � Reps and Certs -Applicable fill in clauses and provisions located throughout the Combined synopsis and the attached RFQ fillable requirements -Supporting documentation to show acceptability to the salient characteristics (specifications sheet)
Who won similar work
11 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Matched by: Same agency (TSA), any industry: a loose match.
Loose match: same agency, any industry. Read the titles before treating these as competitors.
Single-winner award sizes (11): middle half $129K to $18.9M, median $1.1M; range $38K to $2.6B.
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leidos, Inc · $LDOS · $15.3B | 2 | $3.3B | Sep 30, 2026 |
| Rohde & Schwarz USA, Inc. | 1 | $23.3M | Nov 17, 2025 |
| NORTH BELT OFFICE CENTER, LLC | 1 | $14.5M | Nov 25, 2025 |
| AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC · $A · $6.8B | 1 | $7.5M | Dec 1, 2025 |
| GLOBAL SUPPLY MANAGEMENT INC | 1 | $1.1M | Sep 17, 2025 |
| DS GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS CORP | 1 | $210K | Dec 1, 2025 |
| CHARPIE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. | 1 | $207K | Oct 7, 2026 |
| TS GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS. LLC | 1 | $51K | Sep 5, 2025 |
| MIKE'S ELECTRIC, INC. | 1 | $47K | Oct 1, 2026 |
| DSA DETECTION LLC | 1 | $38K | Oct 1, 2026 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in. Revenue next to a ticker is the company's last annual revenue from its 10-K.
- $LDOS reported $15.3B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 11 past awards, $1.1M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
- $A reported $6.8B revenue in FY2025. The median single-winner award in these 11 past awards, $1.1M, is under 0.1% of that. 10-K
One award's total value against one year of revenue; many awards are paid over several years.
- Oct 7, 2026CHARPIE CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.$207KFence & Defensive Barrier Installation for TSA at Milwaukee Mitchell International Airport (MKE)
- Oct 1, 2026DSA DETECTION LLC$38KScreening Bins for AT X-Ray Machines at MIA
- Oct 1, 2026MIKE'S ELECTRIC, INC.$47KVermont Regional Airport (RUT) CCTV System Upgrade
- Sep 30, 2026Leidos, Inc$672.5MScreening Equipment Deployment Services (SEDS) - Checkpoint (CP)
- Dec 1, 2025DS GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS CORP$210KModel Based Systems Engineering (MBSE)
- Dec 1, 2025AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC$7.5MBulk Resolution Technology (BRT) systems and maintenance
- Nov 25, 2025NORTH BELT OFFICE CENTER, LLC$14.5MTSA Leased Space Houston, TX
- Nov 17, 2025Rohde & Schwarz USA, Inc.$23.3MAdvanced Imaging Technology (AIT) Units
- Sep 17, 2025GLOBAL SUPPLY MANAGEMENT INC$1.1MTSA Uniform Items
- Sep 5, 2025TS GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS. LLC$51KBrand name Life Fitness Integrity+ SL Treadmills
Competitive landscape
For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 1 of these past winners lobbied Transportation Security Administration (TSA) since 2024 (5 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Transportation Security Administration (TSA) job
- $247K from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Homeland Security, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 2 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards. A sale marked 10b5-1 was made under a trading plan set up in advance.
- 2 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 3 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.