The Data COUNTS� (Collect Data Once, Use Numerous Times)
National Institutes of Health · NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH NIAID
Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.
Where this opportunity stands
Every notice posted under solicitation 75N95C26R00005 in this department, oldest first.
Next steps for this stage
Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.
- Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
- Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
- Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.
What the notice says
Description This is a Request for Information (RFI). This is NOT a solicitation for proposals, proposal abstracts, or questions. The purpose of this RFI is to obtain knowledge and information for project planning purposes. The Government does not intend to award a contract on the basis of the RFI or otherwise pay for the information requested. Responses will be treated as information only and not as a proposal. The NIH seeks information on technologies and capabilities to further the objectives of the Data COUNTS program. The Data COUNTS� (Collect Data Once, Use Numerous Times) effort is built… (show all)
on collaboration between patients and advocates, government, health systems, technology companies, and the private sector. The Data COUNTS program enables the NIH�s Real-World Data initiative and will provide high quality, standardized data that is provenanced and available through approved access to the research community. The contemplated capability will initially perform requested and approved extraction from Healthcare Partner EMR systems and should be modular and extensible to other authorized source systems such as laboratory information systems, pharmacy information systems, picture archiving and communication systems, vendor-neutral archives, and specialty systems. The Data COUNTS program requires that source data, and source provenance metadata, permissions, and source ontology fields will be preserved without modification or loss. This program will not create or standardize ontology mappings. Technical Requirements of Interest: Address availability and technologies that enable the following features: A durable, Healthcare Partner Leave Behind Technology capability that remains at the Healthcare Partner site after contract completion and can be operated by trained staff without ongoing involvement. The technology should be available and free for use by Healthcare Partners while in the Data COUNTS program. Describe any installation and configuration documentation, operational runbooks, site-controlled credential-transfer procedures, documented dependencies, major-release update procedures, and training that enable independent site operations. Deep query for approved extraction from Healthcare Partner electronic medical records (EMR) systems and other authorized source systems. Capture timestamps and provenance for all data at extraction and maintain an immutable provenance chain. The architecture consumes a machine-readable, version-controlled, authorized, and approved Data Request Specification defining cohort logic, requested source systems, data domains and fields, date range, full or incremental extraction mode, refresh cadence, and applicable authorization and permission rules. Describe how the solution validates data availability against the specification, identifies unavailable or ambiguous fields, avoids silent substitutions, associates the request identifier with each batch and output, and supports reproducible reruns when source data have not changed. An initial automated data quality check validating completeness, uniqueness, data types, date sequencing, and records-per-patient. All anomalies must be reported before any permitted corrections are applied. Sourced data will not be modified De-identification per 45 CFR �164.514(b): remove all 18 direct identifiers; document a consistent de-identification pathway; and apply a per-patient date-shifting specification that preserves temporal order. Privacy Preserving Record Linkage (PPRL) tokenization capabilities for cross-site linkage using an approved, on-premises within the institutional trust boundary PPRL platform that generates consistent, irreversible patient tokens. Describe validation and Healthcare Partner approval before the first live transmission. Describe how token consistency is achieved across independently deployed, site-local PPRL instances, without introducing a shared trust boundary outside the Healthcare Partner site. Describe how the solution preserves all source provenance metadata, permissions information, and ontology fields (e.g. SNOMED CT, LOINC, ICD-10, RxNorm, UCUM, etc.) without modification or loss, excluding authorized de-identification transformations performed under Section 4. The DSP will not create or standardize ontology mappings. Metadata must be additive, clearly identified, and each output value must be traceable to the source and authorized transformation. Describe how the solution consumes authoritative eligibility supplied by the Healthcare Partner and applies it before transmission; records the governing authorization or permission version for each dataset; distinguish cohort exclusions from permission exclusions; and apply revocations so that revoked records are absent from all subsequent refreshes. Describe how the solution generates full and incremental extracts; maintains stable patient tokens; creates unique snapshot and refresh IDs; supports idempotent reruns; identifies added, updated, deleted, merged, unmerged, corrected, and late-arriving records to the appropriate refresh cycle. Workflow Integrity & Processing Audit: maintain audit records for each stage; timestamp, stage ID, batch ID, record counts, outcome, and reconciliation status. Failed reconciliations or incomplete processing stages must halt transmission until resolved or authorized for reprocessing. Security Posture: Describe the ability to attest to HIPAA Security Rule compliance as a Business Associate; Security Audit Logging to generate SIEM-compatible security logs for authentication, administrative actions, configuration changes, and security events. Record timestamp, user/service account, action, resource, and outcome. Security logs must be protected against unauthorized modification or deletion, and logging must be continuous. Defense-in-Depth Encryption: TLS 1.3 where supported; TLS 1.2 minimum for all data in transit,; application-level encryption of output files and VM-level encryption. Attack Surface Minimization with no unnecessary ports, services, or network listeners by default. The only authorized external connection is the outbound TLS path to the Data COUNT Program Also see Section 1 regarding on-site operation of Leave Behind Technology; this section addresses the boundary for identifiable data processing. Describe how identifiable processing is confined to the Healthcare Partner�s VM and institutional trust boundary; only de-identified, tokenized output is transmitted for the Data COUNTS program; access is integrated with Healthcare Partner identity and access controls and is site-managed and logged; and the deployed solution does not include or permit contractor credentials, contractor remote-access pathways, or contractor remote-management capabilities. Describe supported performance at baseline, 2X, and 5X expected workloads and identify assumed data volumes, throughput, processing time, and Healthcare Partner CPU, memory, storage, network and staffing requirements. Describe how the solution can reliably package, transmit, reconcile, and retry deliveries to the TDB, including package, schema versioning, and error resolution. Business Information Requested Please provide information on the following: Details on which capabilities are able to be met Clarification on which features are commercial off-the-shelf (COTS), and which features would be considered minor modifications, and which features would be considered custom development features Billing model and pricing structure and any additional features and their subsequent costs Experience with successful implementation capabilities and list of healthcare partners Experience of similar work with Federal Government agencies Experience of similar work with industries or non-profit organizations Business size and status Response Format: Responses must be submitted by October 1, 2026, 3:00 Eastern Standard Time to DataCounts@nih.gov with the subject line Company Name RFI Response. Responses must be submitted in PDF o
Who won similar work
5 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Match: Same agency (National Institutes of Health), same industry group (NAICS 5415).
| Winner | Awards | Value | Last |
|---|---|---|---|
| AXLE INFORMATICS, LLC | 1 | $11.2M | Sep 30, 2025 |
| Axle Informatics Rockville MD 20852 USA | 1 | $4.3M | May 22, 2025 |
| CORE-1 IT SOLUTIONS INC | 1 | $116K | Sep 27, 2026 |
| IQVIA GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS INC | 1 | $74K | Jan 23, 2026 |
| A-TUNE SOFTWARE INC. | 1 | $24K | Sep 17, 2025 |
Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in.
- Sep 27, 2026CORE-1 IT SOLUTIONS INC$116KDatacenter Relocation and Decommission
- Jan 23, 2026IQVIA GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS INC$74K66--Labmatrix Software Support Renewal
- Sep 30, 2025AXLE INFORMATICS, LLC$11.2MN3C Dynamic Workspaces for NCATS
- Sep 17, 2025A-TUNE SOFTWARE INC.$24Ktick@lab rX (SaaS) Edition
- May 22, 2025Axle Informatics Rockville MD 20852 USA$4.3MNCATS Informatics Support
Competitive landscape
For the 5 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.
- 0 of these past winners lobbied Natl Institutes of Health (NIH) since 2024 (0 filings)
- 0 of their lobbyists list a past Natl Institutes of Health (NIH) job
- No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
- 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
Policy around it
Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.
- 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
- 0 rules from the department in the last 12 months
- 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
Market
For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards.
- 0 of the past winners are listed companies
- 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.
Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.