Sources SoughtPosted Sep 29, 2026·Responses due Oct 6, 2026

Request For Information M67854-26-I-2023: Own Force Monitoring at Echelon (OFM-E) Electromagnetic Spectrum Sensing

Navy and Marine Corps · COMMANDER

Stage
Early notice (sources sought, presolicitation or special notice)
NAICS
334220
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
M67854-26-I-2023
Set-aside
No Set aside used
PSC
5895
Place
Quantico, VA, USA
Contact
Alexis Brown (alexis.brown@usmc.mil)
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation M67854-26-I-2023 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
  • Sep 29, 2026 · this notice
    Sources Sought
  • Sep 30, 2026
    Sources Sought
    Open
Solicitation
None posted
Award
Not yet. Typical award: Nov 8, 2026 to May 4, 2027, middle of the range Nov 24, 2026.
Measured from 11 past early notices at Dept of the Navy with NAICS 334220 that later posted an award (middle half of cases, counted from Sep 29, 2026).

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
  • Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
  • Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.

What the notice says

1 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) M67854-26-I-2023 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION Document Type: Request for Information/Market Research Sources Sought: All Businesses � Under North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 334220 Closing date for RFI: 6 October 2026, at 11:59 pm, local time, Quantico, Virginia This RFI initiates market research under Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 10.001. This RFI is for informational and planning purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation for bids or proposals and is not to be construed as a commitment by the Government. No Statement o… (show all)

f Work, Performance Specifications, or Requirements Package is currently available for release. This RFI is a market research tool to determine the availability and adequacy of potential commercial sources. The Government is not obligated to reimburse, and will not pay, for any information received from potential sources as a result of this RFI. The information provided herein is subject to change and in no way binds the Government to solicit for, or award, a competitive or sole source contract. 2.0 DESCRIPTION The Program Acquisition Executive Marine Corps (PAE MC) Program Manager Tactical Communications and Electromagnetic Warfare Systems (PM TCE), Electronic Warfare Systems (EWS) team is seeking industry feedback regarding a capability to perform Own Force Monitoring/Sensing (OFM/S) within the electromagnetic spectrum. The overall OFM/S capability will include multiple configurations including Own Force Monitoring at Echelon (OFM-E) and Squad Level Sensing (SLS). The Marine Corps seeks Commercial or Non-Developmental Items (NDI) that can meet Marine Corps� operational and performance requirements. Draft documentation defining these requirements will be provided upon request. While the Marine Corps intends to provide the OFM/S capability via multiple configurations, this RFI focuses on the OFM-E. OFM-E consists of vehicle- or command post-mounted systems that provide persistent monitoring and integration with Command Control Computer/Electromagnetic Battle Management System (EMBM), operated by Space and Propagation Engineering Officers, Spectrum Managers and communications specialists at company, battalion, and higher echelons. The OFM/S capability is designed to provide Marine Corps units with real-time awareness, passive analysis, and monitoring of their electromagnetic spectrum (EMS) signatures. OFM/S enables commanders and operators to establish baseline emissions, detect signature anomalies, identify unauthorized transmissions, and enforce active signature management (SIGMAN) and emission control (EMCON) measures across all operational echelons. By delivering actionable intelligence on friendly force emissions, the OFM/S system enhances operational security, supports signature deception, and maximizes survivability in contested and congested electromagnetic operating environments. The Attachment is available upon email 2 request to Alexis Brown at alexis.brown@usmc.mil and Wanda Harner at wanda.harner@usmc.mil. This RFI will aid in the requirements generation process and receive feedback from industry on the current status of potential solutions. This RFI is being issued to invite interested parties to submit information regarding industry capabilities for the Government to assess the industry's capability to deliver an integrated OFME solution, as well as collect feedback on modular or subsystem components that align with the Sensor Open Systems Architecture (SOSA) capability. Information received in response to this notice will directly inform ongoing requirements refinement and support the development of the Government's overarching acquisition, contracting, and sustainment strategy. 3.0 BACKGROUND The Marine Corps seeks a Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) or Non-Developmental Item solution that provides operational units with the ability to sense and visualize the Radio Frequency (RF) spectrum in direct proximity to their locations. This will enable the Fleet Marine Forces (FMF) to understand their own spectrum signature within the electromagnetic spectrum (EMS), allowing units to detect unknown and potentially threatening signatures as well as optimize their own signature to maneuver within the spectrum while avoiding detection where possible. This capability will posture the Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) to provide near-real-time analytics of technical signatures including visualizing friendly use of the EMS and support the employment of Force Protection Conditions (FPCON) to include Emissions Control (EMCON) procedures. This effort supports service modernization requirements and possesses improved size, weight, and power (SWaP) attributes. The ideal solution will be a SOSA-aligned capability. The OFM/S will leverage commercially available or non-developmental solutions in order to rapidly meet operational requirements (i.e. TRL 8 or 9). 4.0 RESPONSE FORMAT Responses should be prepared in accordance with the following guidelines: � Utilizing either Word (docx, 2013 or newer) or Adobe (pdf) software. � Times New Roman 12 (or larger) font, single-spaced, including tables, on 8.5 by 11 inches paper. � A font size smaller than 12 may be used in figures and drawings, but type shall be clearly legible. � Margins on all sides (top, bottom, left, and right) shall be at least 1 inch. � A cover sheet that includes: o Project title. o Company name. o Product name(s) o Primary point of contact, including name, address, phone and e-mail contact information; and o Date of submission. Interested parties are requested to provide an information package addressing their approach to meeting the draft system requirements listed above, to include the following: 3 � Executive summary with a brief overview of their proposed approach, company background, and relevant past performance. � Complete Specification Compliance Matrix in tabular breakdown for every requirement listed in specification. � Your organization�s description of, and its capability to provide, an integrated solution which meets the requirements defined in this RFI. Please provide details concerning integration efforts as well as components to be used. � A description of your device specifications, addressing each functional area under the draft system requirements. � The technological readiness levels of all components used, and an assessment of when production models can be delivered. If additional testing is required, a detailed assessment of how long it would take to meet testing requirements following contract award. � A detailed assessment and recommendation on any capability, which if relief were granted or deferred, could accelerate fielding of an OFM-E capability. � How any additional features of the system noted in your response meet or exceed the objective requirements. � Whether your solution is considered commercially available off-the shelf or a non-developmental item in accordance with FAR 2.101. If yes, provide supporting documentation (e.g., commercial price lists, non-government customer sales history, or proof of customary commercial terms) � Production Capacity & Reliability Data: If currently in production, provide reliability data alongside current and maximum monthly manufacturing capacity (units per month), including lead time required from contract award to first unit delivery. If not currently in production, provide predicted/modeled reliability estimates, current Manufacturing Readiness Level (MRL), anticipated monthly production rate once scaled, and lead time required to transition from prototype to initial production delivery. � Provide any test reports conducted on behalf of or by a government agency which demonstrate how your product meets testing requirements specified in the draft system requirements. � Provided copies of certifications currently possessed (i.e. Lithium Battery, Spectrum Allocation, FCC Part 15). � The manufacturer warranties for your offered produc

Who won similar work

43 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Match: Same agency (Navy and Marine Corps), same NAICS 334220.

WinnerAwardsValueLast
RAYTHEON COMPANY · $RTX2$547.4MDec 11, 2025
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION · $NOC2$22.8MJul 9, 2025
THE BOEING COMPANY · $BA2$7.1MOct 22, 2025
3DB LABS INC2$1.1MApr 24, 2026
CARROLL WOODS INC2$465KJul 31, 2026
COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL INC2$153KSep 24, 2025
L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. · $LHX1$307.7MApr 20, 2026
DATA LINK SOLUTIONS LLC1$307.7MApr 20, 2026
ISPA TECHNOLOGY LLC1$74.3MSep 10, 2025
AEG GROUP INC1$49.7MFeb 13, 2025

Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 8 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 2 of these past winners lobbied Navy, Dept of or U.S. Marines since 2024 (30 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past Navy, Dept of or U.S. Marines job
  • $1.4M from their corporate PACs since 2024 to members of House Committee on Appropriations, House Committee on Armed Services, Senate Committee on Appropriations, Senate Committee on Armed Services
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 8 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 32 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards.

  • 4 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 5 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.