Pre-solicitationPosted Aug 20, 2026·Responses due Aug 25, 2026

Architect-Engineer (A/E) Services � Independent Structural Analysis of Existing Braai Canopy

State · AMERICAN CONSULATE CAPE TOWN

Stage
Early notice (sources sought, presolicitation or special notice)
NAICS
541330
Value
Not stated
Solicitation
19SF2026Q0017
Set-aside
No Set aside used
PSC
C219
Place
Cape Town, ZA-WC, ZAF
Contact
Natheer Ford (fordn@state.gov)
CSV Email

Capture briefs (a one-page, shareable copy of this page) are part of Pro. The CSV here holds the notice, its timeline and past awards.

Where this opportunity stands

Every notice posted under solicitation 19SF2026Q0017 in this department, oldest first.

Early notice
  • Aug 20, 2026 · this notice
    Pre-solicitation
Solicitation
None posted
Award
Not yet. Typical award: Oct 25, 2026 to Feb 1, 2027, middle of the range Dec 10, 2026.
Measured from 110 past early notices at State, Department of that later posted an award (middle half of cases, counted from Aug 20, 2026).

Next steps for this stage

Standard steps for the notice type; not advice about this buyer.

  • Answer the notice: this is when the requirement can still be shaped.
  • Contact the contracting officer named on the notice.
  • Check who won similar work; they are the likely bidders.

What the notice says

The U.S. Consulate General Cape Town invites qualified Architect-Engineer (A/E) firms to submit their qualifications to perform an independent structural assessment of an existing braai canopy and associated flue/chimney termination located on U.S. Government property in Cape Town, South Africa. IMPORTANT: This is a qualifications-based selection. Do not submit pricing information at this stage. 1. Requirement The Government requires a qualified A/E firm to independently assess whether the existing braai canopy and associated flue/chimney installation are structurally adequate, code-compliant,… (show all)

and suitable for continued safe use. Conduct an on-site inspection of the existing structure. Perform structural analysis and calculations. Assess compliance with applicable South African building requirements and relevant engineering standards. Identify structural deficiencies and recommend remedial measures, if required. Prepare a signed/sealed professional engineering report documenting findings and recommendations. The lead structural/civil engineer shall be registered with the Engineering Council of South Africa (ECSA) as a Professional Engineer (Pr.Eng.), or hold an acceptable equivalent U.S. Professional Engineer (P.E.) license. A detailed Statement of Work (SOW) will be provided to the most highly qualified firm following completion of the qualifications evaluation. 2. Selection Method This acquisition will be conducted using the qualifications-based selection procedures of FAR Subpart 36.6 and the Short Selection Process under FAR 36.602-5 and DOSAR 636.602-5. Firms will be evaluated on professional qualifications, relevant experience, capacity, past performance, and local knowledge. Price will not be considered during the qualifications evaluation. Following selection, the Government will provide the detailed SOW to the most highly qualified firm and request a price proposal. The Contracting Officer will then negotiate a fair and reasonable price. If agreement cannot be reached, the Government may proceed with the next most highly qualified firm in accordance with FAR Subpart 36.6. 3. Qualifications Submission A completed SF330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications. Evidence of current professional registration/licensure for the proposed lead structural/civil engineer. Up to three (3) relevant projects demonstrating experience with structural inspections, assessments, or analysis of existing structures. Two (2) client references for similar work. A brief statement confirming the firm's availability and capacity to perform the work in Cape Town. SF330 submissions should focus on personnel and projects directly relevant to this requirement. SF330 form: https://www.gsa.gov/forms-library/architect-engineer-qualifications Do not include prices, fees, hourly rates, or other cost information in the qualifications submission. 4. Evaluation Criteria 1. Professional Qualifications - 35%: Qualifications and professional registration/licensure of the proposed personnel. 2. Specialized Experience and Technical Competence - 30%: Experience performing structural inspections, assessments, calculations, and analysis of existing structures of similar nature or complexity. 3. Capacity - 10%: Ability and availability to perform the requirement within the required timeframe. 4. Past Performance - 10%: Quality and successful performance of similar professional engineering assignments. 5. Local Knowledge - 10%: Knowledge of applicable South African building requirements, engineering standards, and local conditions. 6. Other Relevant Qualifications - 5%: Other capabilities directly relevant to successful performance of the requirement. The Government will select the most highly qualified firm based on the qualifications evaluation. 5. Vendor Compliance The successful firm will be required to complete the attached NDAA Section 889 Vendor Compliance Certification prior to award. The certification is not required with the initial qualifications submission. 6. Price Negotiation and Contract Award Following selection of the most highly qualified firm, the Government will provide the detailed SOW and request a price proposal. The Contracting Officer will negotiate with the selected firm to establish a fair and reasonable price. If agreement cannot be reached, the Government may proceed with the next most highly qualified firm. Only the U.S. Government Contracting Officer (CO) is authorized to negotiate, commit, or award a contract on behalf of the U.S. Government. Submission of qualifications does not constitute an award or authorization to begin work. 7. Submission Instructions Qualifications shall be submitted electronically and in English and must clearly reference: SOQ - Independent Structural Analysis of Existing Braai Canopy Reference No.: 19SF2025Q0017 IMPORTANT: DO NOT INCLUDE PRICING INFORMATION WITH YOUR QUALIFICATIONS SUBMISSION. END OF REQUEST FOR STATEMENTS OF QUALIFICATIONS

Who won similar work

3 award notices on SAM.gov in the last 24 months. Match: Same agency (State), same industry group (NAICS 5413).

WinnerAwardsValueLast
TEN BERKE ARCHITECTS D.P.C , DUVALL DECKER-SPACESMITH, JV, ENNEAD ARCHITECTS LLP1$100.0MMar 31, 2026
Architecture 359, Inc.1$35KFeb 27, 2026
ECOTONO URBANO San Pedro Garza Garcia Nuevo Leon 66230 MEX1$21KMay 16, 2025

Value counts single-winner awards. "Shared" awards are multiple-award contracts that list every winner with the same total ceiling; that ceiling is not one company's win, so it is not added in.

Latest awards

Competitive landscape

For the 3 most frequent past winners above. Lobbying is matched by the company's exact name or exact ticker; agencies are as named on the filings.

  • 0 of these past winners lobbied State, Dept of (DOS) since 2024 (0 filings)
  • 0 of their lobbyists list a past State, Dept of (DOS) job
  • No corporate PAC money from them to the overseeing committees since 2024
  • 0 foreign-agent (FARA) registrations
See who and the source records with Pro

Policy around it

Bills the past winners named while lobbying this agency's issues, rules from the department, and executive orders that name the agency, last 12 months.

  • 0 bills named on the past winners' lobbying filings
  • 33 rules from the department in the last 12 months
  • 0 executive orders naming the agency in the last 12 months
See who and the source records with Pro

Market

For past winners matched exactly to a listed company. Insider trades are open-market buys and sells (Form 4) in the last 90 days, shown as facts; our own study found insiders do not reliably buy ahead of awards.

  • 0 of the past winners are listed companies
  • 0 insider buys and 0 insider sells at them in the last 90 days
See who and the source records with Pro

Sources: SAM.gov notices and award notices; Senate LDA lobbying filings; FEC filings; FARA; Federal Register; congress.gov; SEC Form 4. Every row above links to its record.

Companies are matched to tickers by exact name only. A company we could not match shows no market rows; that is a miss, not a finding.